The United Nations in its Second Half-Century

The Independent Working Group

The Independent Working Group on the Future of the United Nations was convened by the Ford Foundation at the request of Secretary General Boutros Boutros- Ghali in late 1993.

Challenges to Humanity at Century's End
There has been a growing interdependence of world economies. The gap between rich and poor populations is widening. In addition, security issues are a problem that is shared by rich and poor civilians worldwide.

The Future United Nations System
United Nations organizations must complement each other within the framework of an integrated system.

Future Goals:

  1. The Security Council will be enhanced and more representative of the international system.
  2. The need to assist faltering states and bring them back into the international community will have been broadly recognized by UN members; in accordance with nation-building guidelines.
  3. Regional organizations will play a greater role assisting the United Nations in the work that it conducts.
  4. The United Nations security system of the future will have learned the lessons offered by the successes and failures of peacekeeping missions of the early 1990s.
  5. The fear that a sweeping human rights agenda would intrude upon national sovereignty will have given way to the recognition that societies are better protected, and their prospects for sustained human development improved, by systems of representative government whereby the rights of individuals and groups are assured.
  6. As the global economy becomes interdependent the enhanced UN system will have begun to harmonize trade practices, technological cooperation and monetary policies of Member States and international institutions.

Strengthening the United Nations for its Second Half-Century

Providing Security from the Scourge of Violence

The widening mandate and changing characteristics of United Nations operations have caused problems within the organization including monetary strains on the system, mandates and inconsistent guidelines for certain operations. There have also been some problems regarding operations taking place simultaneously. Furthermore, mandates and guidelines have created unmanageable and often unfeasible circumstances due to expected inconsistency when combining peacekeeping, peace-enforcement, humanitarian action and post-conflict rebuilding.

Security Council: Sustaining Authority and Effectiveness
Proposal: Expansion of the Permanent Membership and a restriction of the existing veto privilege.

  1. The Security Council would be expanded from its present membership of 15 to a total of approximately 22 Members, of whom not more than five would be new Permanent Members.
  2. The veto is an issue that has prevailed in the reform debate. Most proposals suggest that the veto be eliminated or at the very least only applicable to peacekeeping and enforcement measurements

Early Warning and Threat Assessment
Proposals:

  1. Establish in the Secretary General’s office an early-warning and threat assessment section; provide the Secretary General and the UN’s intergovernmental bodies with better information of impending crisis.
  2. Recommendation that a Security Assessment Staff, drawn from existing departments and through secondment from functional organizations, be established as part of the Office of the Secretary-General.

Clarifying the Concepts of UN Military Action
Proposal:

  1. Recommendation that when the Security Council adopts a resolution authorizing the use of military force of any kind, the resolution should clearly state whether the force will be used for peacekeeping, peace-enforcement under Article 40 of the Charter, or collective security action under Article 42. It should be clearly provided that forces acted on behalf of the Council will not exceed the Council’s mandate. In addition, any change in the original mandate must be approved by the Security Council and explained to the participating Member States.

Action against Aggression:
Proposal:

  1. The Security Council should establish an ad hoc military authority for each operation, encompassing representatives of the parties involved in the operation.

Rapid Response Capability:
Proposal: A United Nations Rapid Reaction Force should be established for urgent deployment on the decisions of the Security Council.

The responsibilities of this particular force would include:

  1. Establish a UN presence
  2. Provide security for UN personnel
  3. An airport to bring supplies and additional UN personnel for evacuations
  4. Establish one or more safe areas for the civilian population
  5. Limit escalation and assist in ending the violence
  6. Provide limited humanitarian assistance in emergency circumstances
  7. Assess and report on the situation to the Secretary- General and the Security Council

Sanctions:
Proposal:

  1. A system of field monitoring should be developed by the Secretary General with the cooperation of relevant UN functional agencies. This would be an important task for the Security Assessment Staff, which would provide the Secretary General and the Security Council with the information they require for imposing, measuring and adjusting sections.

Arms Control and Weapons of Mass Destruction:
Proposal:

  1. The Security Council, through a joint General Assembly-Security Council Working Group, should keep under review the progress in disarmament negotiations, transmit proposals and guidelines to the Conference on Disarmament for negotiation, and mobilize the political will of governments in an attempt to provide impetus to the negotiations.

Improving Global Economic Conditions

The Global Alliance for Sustainable Development

The foundation of a Global Alliance for Sustainable Development should consist of two councils. Currently the proposed Economic and Social Councils are joined under one single organ known as ECOSOC. This alliance takes on a number of different duties including consensus on development issues and plans of common action that can best alleviate economic and social concerns around the world. Furthermore by bringing together their expertise and knowledge on various subjects, The Alliance will be able to achieve cooperation between various elements of society.

The Economic Council
Proposal: The establishment of an Economic Council as a principal organ of the United Nations is recommended. The Economic Council should, in consultation with the Social Council, the Security Council and the General Assembly, be empowered to formulate guidelines to integrate the work of all UN agencies; including international institutions, programs, and offices engaged in economic issues.

Important functions of the Council would include:

  1. Building consensus among the member states of economic policies
  2. Harmonizing economic policies of major economies around the world
  3. Open discussion on politically sensitive issues that have a global impact
  4. In dealing with poverty, the Economic Council should create development policies involving government, intergovernmental and non-state actors

Proposal: We further recommend that the Economic Council have a standing Advisory Committee, composed of distinguished and talented individuals drawn from various disciplines and professional fields. The involvement of the private sectors is also important in this endeavor.

Social Council

The Social Council, similar to its counterpart the Economic Council, would be a forum for discussions to take place and form consensus on the methods that states should implement in order to remedy the social issues around the world. Examples of global social issues are: the spreading of the AIDS epidemic, persistent gender inequality, failing educational institutions, rapid population growth, drug abuse and narcotics trafficking and corruption

Proposals:

  1. The Social Council should be empowered to supervise and
    integrate the work of all UN activities relating to issues of social development.
  2. The Social Council should consist of representatives of no more that 23 states elected by the General Assembly with due regard for geographic representation and a balance between countries with larger and smaller populations.
  3. The Social Councils would also look to non-state representatives to assists
    in every states of its work, from early consultations to implementation. It is essential that the Council have always available the advice of regional organizations and that for their part, regional organizations have a sense of participation in the Council’s work. Like the Economic Council, the Social Councils should also have a standing advisory Board composed of distinguished individuals drawn from various disciplines, professional fields, and other groups involved in social and human rights policies.

Promoting Respect for Human Rights
Proposals:

  1. The Center needs an enhanced capacity to assess alleged violations of economic, social, environmental and political rights in an independent and timely manner.
  2. The Commission should report to the Social Council and continue to undertake human rights investigations. It should develop links with, and consult, regional organizations concerning fact finding and adjudication.

Assisting States in Distress
Proposal: The Social Council should coordinate efforts to rebuild the weakened society.

The Social Council in cooperation with the Economic and Security Council should:

  1. Mobilize the resources of the UN system to aid a state encountering severe problem in order to prevent total disintegration of the social fabric
  2. Should work to build into any recovery package, social, political and environmental dimensions

Leadership, Organization and Resources

Leadership

The General Assembly needs to be the organ of the United Nations under which all member states are represented. The Secretary General’s authority as chief negotiator ought to be reaffirmed, recognized and supported.

Proposal: Further streamlining and rationalizing of General Assembly procedures with emphasis on a smaller agenda. Efforts should be directed towards implementing agree-on agendas in the economic and social spheres with the new Economic Council and Social council. These councils will be handling such issues on a continuing basis, but still need a close working relationship with the Assembly. Above all, Member States must recognize their responsibility to support the General Assembly’s vital place at the center of the world organization.

Organization:
Proposal: We recommend that a committee of permanent representatives and senior staff appointed by the Secretary-General be convened to consider how these and other reforms recently proposed by various external bodies and individuals can be undertaken.

Financing:
Proposal: Most important of all, the time has come to recognize that the UN will need additional sources of funding that are not dependent on political and budgetary constraints under which most governments operate. An expert group should review and examine the administrative, legal and economic feasibility of the options.

Reaching the Common Goal

In order to be effective and successful the United Nations system needs to be revitalized. If the goals of the United Nations are set in the correct direction with peace and security of the international community in the forefront, then the United Nations will be critically important in centering the world’s attention on what needs to be accomplished, and identifying solutions to the problems that block the way.


Latest Updates

The Council on Foreign Relations posts video talk on Security Council Reform
On 11 January 2012 the Council on Foreign Relations posted a video talk by Stewart M. Patrick on Security Council Reform, entitled “UN Security Council Reform: Is it Time?”. Click here to watch the video talk on the CFR website

Meeting on General Assembly Revitalization 1 December 2011
By Mie Hansen, 5 January 2012
On 1 December 2011 the General Assembly met to discuss Agenda Item 120: Implementation of the Resolutions of the United Nations and Agenda Item 121: Revitalization of the Work of the General Assembly.
This article provides an overview of the debate.

Former consultant with the Center for UN Reform Education wins prestigious award
By Thomas Colerick, 13 December 2011

Meeting in the General Assembly on Security Council Reform, 8 and 9 November 2011
By Mie Hansen, 7 December 2011
On 8 and 9 November 2011 the 51st and 52nd plenary meetings of the 66th General Assembly session were held with a discussion of Agenda Item 122: Question of equitable representation on and increase in the membership of the Security Council and related matters. This article gives an overview of the debate and the statements made during the meetings, as well as an update on the developments in regard to Security Council reform leading up to the debate.

The 2011 Annual Report of the Human Rights Council
By Thomas Colerick, 8 November 2011
The 2011 Annual Report of the Council is now available.

Highlights of the Human Rights Council’s 18th Regular session
By Thomas Colerick, 11 October 2011

New report on the Human Rights Council’s fifth year
By Thomas Colerick, 4 October 2011

The Human Rights Council’s 18th Session (12-30 September 2011)
By Thomas Colerick, 28 September 2011

Update on Revitalization of the General Assembly: A RECAP OF DEVELOPMENTS DURING THE 65th GA SESSION
By Mie Hansen, 27 September 2011
Even before heads of state from around the world gathered last week at UN headquarters in New York for the opening of the 66th annual session of the UN General Assembly, the world’s main deliberative body, continuation of the ongoing negotiations to make the Assembly more effective, efficient and relevant were assured for yet another year. Member States have been discussing the “Revitalization of the General Assembly” for the past twenty years, but according to some critics only minor improvements have been made, leaving deep-seated reforms untouched. Even though all Member States seem to agree that reform of the Assembly is vital, recent developments confirm that it is still very difficult to reach an agreement on what should be done.

Chronology: The Human Rights Council – elections, sessions and important developments
By Thomas Colerick, 23 September 2011
As the Center for UN Reform Education once again will be covering the Human Rights Council more systematically, this chronology of the Council is provided. It includes elections, selected sessions and major developments and takes the reader from the Council’s birth in 2006 to today where the Council is currently holding its 18th Session in Geneva, Switzerland.



Panel on Improving Security Council Working Methods
On 23 June 2011, The Center for UN Reform Education held a panel discussion on “Improving the Working Methods of the Security Council”. The basis for the discussion was the most recent version of the S5 draft proposal on Reforming the Working Methods of the Security Council.



Qatar hosts workshop on Security Council Reform
On 12 & 13 May 2011, Qatar hosted a workshop on Security Council Reform in Doha. Lydia Swart of the Center was invited and she shared ten observations on this key reform process.

To move the process along, Member States, the Chair of the Intergovernmental Negotiations, and/or the President of the General Assembly will need to provide leadership by proposing a timeline/trajectory for the negotiations and by formulating a compromise solution that can garner support from all factions.



S5 presents draft resolution on Improving the Working Methods of the Security Council
By Mie Hansen, 2 May 2011
On 14 April, 2011, the Small Five Group (S5), consisting of Costa Rica, Jordan, Liechtenstein, Singapore and Switzerland, presented a draft resolution for Improving the Working Methods of the Security Council. The resolution was presented under agenda item 115 of the General Assembly (GA) that deals with follow-up to the outcome of the Millennium Summit. The S5 had presented its first draft resolution on the topic (A/60/L.49) in 2006 also as follow-up to the 2000/2005 Summits.

Update on Security Council Reform
By Mie Hansen, 5 April 2011
Since the Center’s latest update of 22 June 2010, Members States conducted text-based negotiations on 21 October 2010, 11 November 2010, 14 December 2010, and on 2 March 2011 in their efforts to reform the Security Council. Some countries apparently continue to slow down the negotiations, while others may push for a vote sooner rather than later.

Book Launch, The Group of 77: Perspectives on its Role in the UN General Assembly.
25 April 2011
Pictured from right to left: Center President William R. Pace, Minister Marcelo Suarez Salvia from Argentina (current G77 Chair), Ambassador Maged Abdelaziz of Egypt, Ambassador Herman Schaper of the Netherlands, and co-author Lydia Swart. For their remarks, click here: Minister Suarez, Ambassador Schaper, Ambassador Abdelaziz (pending) and Lydia Swart.





Text-based Negotiations in Full Swing
22 June 2010
On June 16th the negotiations on Security Council reform proceeded with the third meeting of the fifth round. The meeting aimed at getting member states to discuss specific language on the fourth “key issue”. Many countries seemed to have misunderstood the intention of the Chair, however, and restated their positions rather than making suggestions for specific changes to the document at hand.

Potentially Historic Text on Security Council Reform
By Jakob Lund, 13 May 2010
On May 10th, Zahir Tanin, the Chair of the intergovernmental negotiations on the question of equitable representation and increase in the membership of the Security Council and other matters related to the Security Council, sent out a long-awaited fax to all member states containing a “negotiation text”. The text and the annex can be accessed on the website of the PGA. The text includes the proposals sent by member states to Tanin's office since he opened the process of moving towards a text-based solution.

Open Debate on the Working Methods of the Security Council
By Jakob Silas Lund, 28 April 2010
On April 22nd, the Security Council’s Informal Working Group on Documentation and Other Procedural Issues held an open debate on the working methods of the Council. The debate raised some key questions that are relevant to the ongoing Security Council reform negotiations. Furthermore, to keep the issue of its working methods on the agenda of the Security Council is, in and of itself, an accomplishment.

A New Phase in Security Council Reform Has Started
10 February, 2010
On February 5th, the Chair of the intergovernmental negotiations on Security Council reform, Ambassador Tanin of Afghanistan, sent out a letter to all member states with an attachment of sixty pages. The document (available here and here) includes all “substantive input” submitted by Member States to the Chair thus far in the fourth round of negotiations. This marks the beginning of the fifth round, which, for the first time, will be text-based.

Moving Towards Text-Based Negotiations?
By Jakob Silas Lund, 21 January 2010
The previous month was an eventful one in terms of the Security Council reform process. On December 23rd, a group of countries sent a letter to the Chair of the intergovernmental negotiations, Ambassador Tanin of Afghanistan, urging him to present a composite paper. Following that, Tanin received a number of other letters concerning the process and on January 14th he replied with his own letter to all member states. This all culminated in the latest round of negotiations on January 19th and 20th in which the consequences of the letter exchanges were discussed.

Pros and Cons of Security Council reform
By Jakob Silas Lund, 19 January 2010
Through extensive interviews with experts as well as current and former Ambassadors and diplomats who have been close to the reform process, this article outlines and analyzes the advantages and disadvantages of the components incorporated in the proposals currently on the table.

The Long and Winding Road
by Jakob Silas Lund, 11 December, 2009
On November 16th, the chair of the intergovernmental negotiations on Security Council reform, Ambassador Zahir Tanin of Afghanistan, sent a letter to all member states inviting them to the first meeting of the fourth round of negotiations. The negotiations ended up spanning over two days rather than the planned one-day session.