PBC Update: First Lessons Learned on Sierra Leone

20 February 2007

On 20 February 2007 the Peacebuilding Commission Working Group on Lessons Learned convened the First Lessons Learned Meeting on Sierra Leone: Peacebuilding, Elections, and Risk Reduction in Post-Conflict Context. This informal meeting focused on the peacebuilding lessons and good practices on governance issues central to Sierra Leone’s development and peacebuilding goals.1 This meeting offers an opportunity to develop forward-looking lessons and recommendations for Sierra Leone’s second post-conflict presidential and parliamentary elections scheduled for 28 July 2007.

Risks and Concerns for the Election in Sierra Leone
The risks to the Sierra Leone elections are considerable, as they are in any post-conflict state. The most prevalent issues are:

  1. Polarization of Politics and Renewal of Former Grievances
  2. Reactions of the Competing Political Parties to the Election Outcome
  3. Economic, Social and Political Spoilers
  4. Role of the Media
  5. Frustrations of the Youth and other Disadvantaged Groups
  6. Perceptions/Expectations of Unfair Play
  7. Undue Influence of Regional/International actors
  8. Possible Regime Change
  9. Security and Logistical Issues

Sierra Leone officials, as well as the United Nations Integrated Office in Sierra Leone (UNIOSIL) and the United Nations Development Program (UNDP) are concerned that pre-electoral risks will negate all possible outcomes of the elections and signal a return of the conflict. Specifically, these pre-electoral threats include economic, social, and political spoilers (specifically former combatants and “cultural groups”), frustrations of the youth and disadvantaged groups, and the role of the media. The concern is that the political parties will manipulate these groups in a negative manner which could lead to the use of violence as a means of expressing their political views rather than the use of the ballot. Should violence be avoided prior to election day, there are still several risks surrounding the outcome of the election.

Of these risks, the most prevalent is the possible regime change following the election. Should the opposition win the election, the vital issue will be the acceptance of this decision by the incumbent government. The transition of power in post-conflict states is the true test to the effectiveness of democracy. Should the incumbency loose the election and relinquish power willingly, Sierra Leone will have taken the first concrete step toward sustainable peace. If, however, the incumbent government should loose the election and refuse to transition power to the opposition, the political environment in Sierra Leone could quickly polarize, integrating past grievances into current politics jeopardizing the stability achieved thus far. With the very peace of Sierra Leone at stake, country officials are taking several steps to ensure that these risks are minimized as much as possible.

Importance of Successful Post Conflict Elections
From a peacebuilding perspective, the period leading up to and following elections in post-conflict societies invariably generates high risks. It is important to understand and avoid risks in Sierra Leone’s democratic transition and support the full implementation of the recommendations of the Peace Consolidation Strategy.

Sierra Leone’s second elections following the conflict represent a return to normalcy for the country’s political environment. During the first round of elections in post-conflict countries, the people are voting to end the conflict and in favor of peace. However, the upcoming elections in Sierra Leone are focusing on important social issues such as jobs, social policy, and corruption. The debate of these so called normal issues demonstrates that Sierra Leone is transitioning from a post-conflict state to a sustainable peace.

Just as a successful election in Sierra Leone would signify a return to a peaceful society, a failed election could very well bring about a renewal of the conflict or manifest an entirely new and separate conflict. As such, Sierra Leone must be conscious of the risks surrounding the electoral process and take all necessary precautions to ensure the reduction of these risks.

Risk Reducing Steps Currently Employed by Sierra Leone
With so much at stake concerning the July elections, Sierra Leone’s government is being very conscious to employ as many safety measures to ensure that the elections are a success. Sierra Leone has established the National Election Committee (NEC), a newly formed national body aimed at ensuring the elections operate smoothly. Several sectors of the national government are confident that the NEC will be able to conduct the elections well therefore ensuring the continued peace in Sierra Leone.

The NEC has been put in place to ensure the logistical issues of the election are handled well. All security operations surrounding the elections will be conducted by the Office of National Security to eliminate any discrepancies concerning security logistics. The security of the elections will also be tested as formerly the United Nations Mission to Sierra Leone conducted all security measures.

In terms of the media risk, Sierra Leone has taken large strides in the area of freedom of speech. The media today is generally free with marginal censorship concerning certain political sensitivities. The government of Sierra Leone has instituted a Media Code of Conduct to ensure the safety of the elections as well as the success of the confidence building measures.

Additionally, Sierra Leone officials have stressed the importance of upholding the recommendations of the Truth and Reconciliations Council (TRC). Its recommendations are important as there are residual issues that must be addressed to prevent the political parties from using the elections as a forum to discuss them. While emphasizing past steps and implementing new ones to ensure the success of the election are positive steps, there are still many measures Sierra Leone should explore to further reduce the risks surrounding the July elections.

Further Measures to be Implemented
In any post-conflict peacebuilding effort, there are development procedures known as Confidence Building Measures. These are steps taken following a conflict and in the political rebuilding process to prevent the return to conflict.

Confidence Building Measures pertinent to the case of Sierra Leone include establishing a continuous dialogue between both the political parties and the election administration. Such dialogue increases the chances of legitimacy as both parties are more likely to accept the outcome of the elections if they have both played a role in ensuring that they run smoothly. An established party code of conduct should ensure that a losing candidate will concede power. This confidence building measure is firmly rooted in Sierra Leone, as the country has a long history of political parties, political party building, or encouraging groups to create and maintain political parties rather than using para-military means to express political views.

Further Confidence Building Measures include an increased focus on social issues during political debates, a measure which shifts the election away from a post-conflict environment toward normalcy. There should be encouraged debate among the parties concerning the issues at hand; post-conflict states should not worry that debate concerning electoral issues will lead to conflict and therefore censure such talks. In addition, the government should work towards including diasporas, former combatants, and the potentially problematic youth in the political process. This reinforces the message that competition is healthy and acceptable in politics, and promotes inclusion of all citizens in the process.

There are also several policies and bodies specific to the case of Sierra Leone that should be implemented to ensure the success of the electoral process. The government should establish a National Human Rights Council to field some of the grievances related to conflict. The current government should also look into creating a decentralization policy, public procurement policy and restructuring the NEC to ensure a stable environment prior to the election. Following the election, there should be laws concerning political parties, framework law and electoral law. These measures are to ensure that technical issues immediately following the outcome of an election will not jeopardize the peace.

---------------------------------------

Prepared by Ashley Hatchel


Latest Updates

The Council on Foreign Relations posts video talk on Security Council Reform
On 11 January 2012 the Council on Foreign Relations posted a video talk by Stewart M. Patrick on Security Council Reform, entitled “UN Security Council Reform: Is it Time?”. Click here to watch the video talk on the CFR website

Meeting on General Assembly Revitalization 1 December 2011
By Mie Hansen, 5 January 2012
On 1 December 2011 the General Assembly met to discuss Agenda Item 120: Implementation of the Resolutions of the United Nations and Agenda Item 121: Revitalization of the Work of the General Assembly.
This article provides an overview of the debate.

Former consultant with the Center for UN Reform Education wins prestigious award
By Thomas Colerick, 13 December 2011

Meeting in the General Assembly on Security Council Reform, 8 and 9 November 2011
By Mie Hansen, 7 December 2011
On 8 and 9 November 2011 the 51st and 52nd plenary meetings of the 66th General Assembly session were held with a discussion of Agenda Item 122: Question of equitable representation on and increase in the membership of the Security Council and related matters. This article gives an overview of the debate and the statements made during the meetings, as well as an update on the developments in regard to Security Council reform leading up to the debate.

The 2011 Annual Report of the Human Rights Council
By Thomas Colerick, 8 November 2011
The 2011 Annual Report of the Council is now available.

Highlights of the Human Rights Council’s 18th Regular session
By Thomas Colerick, 11 October 2011

New report on the Human Rights Council’s fifth year
By Thomas Colerick, 4 October 2011

The Human Rights Council’s 18th Session (12-30 September 2011)
By Thomas Colerick, 28 September 2011

Update on Revitalization of the General Assembly: A RECAP OF DEVELOPMENTS DURING THE 65th GA SESSION
By Mie Hansen, 27 September 2011
Even before heads of state from around the world gathered last week at UN headquarters in New York for the opening of the 66th annual session of the UN General Assembly, the world’s main deliberative body, continuation of the ongoing negotiations to make the Assembly more effective, efficient and relevant were assured for yet another year. Member States have been discussing the “Revitalization of the General Assembly” for the past twenty years, but according to some critics only minor improvements have been made, leaving deep-seated reforms untouched. Even though all Member States seem to agree that reform of the Assembly is vital, recent developments confirm that it is still very difficult to reach an agreement on what should be done.

Chronology: The Human Rights Council – elections, sessions and important developments
By Thomas Colerick, 23 September 2011
As the Center for UN Reform Education once again will be covering the Human Rights Council more systematically, this chronology of the Council is provided. It includes elections, selected sessions and major developments and takes the reader from the Council’s birth in 2006 to today where the Council is currently holding its 18th Session in Geneva, Switzerland.



Panel on Improving Security Council Working Methods
On 23 June 2011, The Center for UN Reform Education held a panel discussion on “Improving the Working Methods of the Security Council”. The basis for the discussion was the most recent version of the S5 draft proposal on Reforming the Working Methods of the Security Council.



Qatar hosts workshop on Security Council Reform
On 12 & 13 May 2011, Qatar hosted a workshop on Security Council Reform in Doha. Lydia Swart of the Center was invited and she shared ten observations on this key reform process.

To move the process along, Member States, the Chair of the Intergovernmental Negotiations, and/or the President of the General Assembly will need to provide leadership by proposing a timeline/trajectory for the negotiations and by formulating a compromise solution that can garner support from all factions.



S5 presents draft resolution on Improving the Working Methods of the Security Council
By Mie Hansen, 2 May 2011
On 14 April, 2011, the Small Five Group (S5), consisting of Costa Rica, Jordan, Liechtenstein, Singapore and Switzerland, presented a draft resolution for Improving the Working Methods of the Security Council. The resolution was presented under agenda item 115 of the General Assembly (GA) that deals with follow-up to the outcome of the Millennium Summit. The S5 had presented its first draft resolution on the topic (A/60/L.49) in 2006 also as follow-up to the 2000/2005 Summits.

Update on Security Council Reform
By Mie Hansen, 5 April 2011
Since the Center’s latest update of 22 June 2010, Members States conducted text-based negotiations on 21 October 2010, 11 November 2010, 14 December 2010, and on 2 March 2011 in their efforts to reform the Security Council. Some countries apparently continue to slow down the negotiations, while others may push for a vote sooner rather than later.

Book Launch, The Group of 77: Perspectives on its Role in the UN General Assembly.
25 April 2011
Pictured from right to left: Center President William R. Pace, Minister Marcelo Suarez Salvia from Argentina (current G77 Chair), Ambassador Maged Abdelaziz of Egypt, Ambassador Herman Schaper of the Netherlands, and co-author Lydia Swart. For their remarks, click here: Minister Suarez, Ambassador Schaper, Ambassador Abdelaziz (pending) and Lydia Swart.





Text-based Negotiations in Full Swing
22 June 2010
On June 16th the negotiations on Security Council reform proceeded with the third meeting of the fifth round. The meeting aimed at getting member states to discuss specific language on the fourth “key issue”. Many countries seemed to have misunderstood the intention of the Chair, however, and restated their positions rather than making suggestions for specific changes to the document at hand.

Potentially Historic Text on Security Council Reform
By Jakob Lund, 13 May 2010
On May 10th, Zahir Tanin, the Chair of the intergovernmental negotiations on the question of equitable representation and increase in the membership of the Security Council and other matters related to the Security Council, sent out a long-awaited fax to all member states containing a “negotiation text”. The text and the annex can be accessed on the website of the PGA. The text includes the proposals sent by member states to Tanin's office since he opened the process of moving towards a text-based solution.

Open Debate on the Working Methods of the Security Council
By Jakob Silas Lund, 28 April 2010
On April 22nd, the Security Council’s Informal Working Group on Documentation and Other Procedural Issues held an open debate on the working methods of the Council. The debate raised some key questions that are relevant to the ongoing Security Council reform negotiations. Furthermore, to keep the issue of its working methods on the agenda of the Security Council is, in and of itself, an accomplishment.

A New Phase in Security Council Reform Has Started
10 February, 2010
On February 5th, the Chair of the intergovernmental negotiations on Security Council reform, Ambassador Tanin of Afghanistan, sent out a letter to all member states with an attachment of sixty pages. The document (available here and here) includes all “substantive input” submitted by Member States to the Chair thus far in the fourth round of negotiations. This marks the beginning of the fifth round, which, for the first time, will be text-based.

Moving Towards Text-Based Negotiations?
By Jakob Silas Lund, 21 January 2010
The previous month was an eventful one in terms of the Security Council reform process. On December 23rd, a group of countries sent a letter to the Chair of the intergovernmental negotiations, Ambassador Tanin of Afghanistan, urging him to present a composite paper. Following that, Tanin received a number of other letters concerning the process and on January 14th he replied with his own letter to all member states. This all culminated in the latest round of negotiations on January 19th and 20th in which the consequences of the letter exchanges were discussed.

Pros and Cons of Security Council reform
By Jakob Silas Lund, 19 January 2010
Through extensive interviews with experts as well as current and former Ambassadors and diplomats who have been close to the reform process, this article outlines and analyzes the advantages and disadvantages of the components incorporated in the proposals currently on the table.

The Long and Winding Road
by Jakob Silas Lund, 11 December, 2009
On November 16th, the chair of the intergovernmental negotiations on Security Council reform, Ambassador Zahir Tanin of Afghanistan, sent a letter to all member states inviting them to the first meeting of the fourth round of negotiations. The negotiations ended up spanning over two days rather than the planned one-day session.