Update on Governance Reform in Burundi

Posted 19 March 2007

On 27 February 2007 the Peacebuilding Commission Support Office hosted a discussion on Burundi: Governance Reform: Enhancing Democracy and Democratic Participation. The purpose of this informal thematic discussion was to obtain relevant information for the formulation of advice and recommendations for the peacebuilding process in Burundi. Insight gained from the meeting will be utilized concerning the creation of an integrated peacebuilding strategy for Burundi.

Challenges for good governance in Burundi
The primary dilemma facing Burundi is the struggle for balance between power and governance, or in other words balance between needs and the resources to meet those needs. The crucial question to be examined in any post-conflict state, as in Burundi, is the ability to strike a good balance between freedom and responsibility. This balance must be established between the government and its citizens, the media and society, as well as with Burundi and the international community.

The humanitarian crisis, compacted by extreme poverty, in Burundi is causing the economic and social foundations of the state to waver. Additional dilemmas encountered by Burundians include a disaffection of its school children as many are too hungry to attend the poorly constructed educational system currently in place. The key to overcoming these issues and ensuring economic and social stability, a vital test in any post-conflict state, is to ensure that micro-economic stabilization remains in balance with the social needs of the people.

Of all the challenges facing good governance in a post-conflict Burundi is that of the growing poverty epidemic. Good governance initiatives cannot take root in the extreme poverty conditions which continue to plague Burundi. 70% of the population lives on less than $1 a day. One third of the population was displaced during the conflict and there is a very high incidence of poverty and malnutrition among the internally displaced peoples. The infrastructure of the state has been destroyed during the chaos of the violence. The educational system was almost completely destroyed in the conflict and access to education is among the lowest of any state in Africa. These issues in and of themselves are sufficient to stifle any state, and in the post-conflict atmosphere of Burundi, the combination is perilous.

What is good governance and why is it important
The promotion of good governance was one of the three priority areas established in the first Country-Specific Meeting on Burundi held on 13 October 2006. The issue of good governance in post-conflict societies is crucial to the sustainability of the peace process as a collapse of the governance structures of a state are often a large contributing force to the outbreak of the violence. During the conflict, the violence overshadows weak governance, which is why governance is often such a difficult issue to address in the peacebuilding process. Establishing good governance in post-conflict states begins with a focus on smooth institutional and leadership transitions. States should not neglect the importance of the transitioning of the leadership in favor of the importance of the transition of the institutions. In Burundi there is a neglect of the importance of ensuring that the leadership is progressing as it should be, as people are more concerned with the infrastructure of the state rather than the institution, an error in judgment which must be corrected in order to move forward.

Within the early stages of peacebuilding, the first one to three years, the main focus is the prevention of the re-emergence of the conflict. As such, the international community must develop national capacities to sustain peace. Good governance is essential to the peacebuilding process and conflict prevention. In an effort to promote good governance, there needs to be a sub-regional dimension to peacebuilding and conflict prevention as many conflicts have a trans-national dimension, especially in the great lakes region.

In the fall of 2006, members of the Peacebuilding were concerned about the tension between power and governance. Power is a delicate balance and maintaining equilibrium is a positive sign of success in peacebuilding. The question of governance is actually concerned with whether or not both the government and the opposition party have the capacity to draw on international assistance through which the grievances and the needs of the people are met through democratic means. Often this ability is impeded by a crisis in confidence in which the people of a particular state do not trust the government to not be corrupt or to protect the best interest of the people.

Promoting good governance in peacebuilding is a delicate issue as it moves sovereign issues, such as the domestic balance of power, to the international arena and opens them up for debate. Therefore, it is important that Burundi play an active role in restructuring governance within her borders and take ownership of the process. The Peacebuilding Commission must promote the basic understanding of the link between the government and the people. This allows for the peaceful redress of grievances, draws all people into dialogue, and focuses the role of civil society. Burundi and the international community must not allow issues such as control of the peacebuilding process and sovereignty to hinder the movement toward peaceful democratization as a tool rather than violence along ethnic lines.

Creating a system of good governance in Burundi has highlighted the need for the creation of an integrated peacebuilding strategy in conjunction with the Peacebuilding Commission. Burundi must take care not to overload the national agenda with too many development programs, ensure that political and social inclusion needs to be both a goal and a means of peacebuilding, and attempt to increase the involvement of local and regional donors. Good governance is a fundamental pre-requisite to development or the capacity of a state to provide basic services which are fundamental to the post-conflict reconstruction. This is why good governance is among the three priority areas established by the Peacebuilding Commission for Burundi.

Collaborative steps toward improving the quality of governance
Burundi, as well as many other post-conflict states, faces the questions of legitimacy: being accepted by the international community at large and the great Lakes Region in particular, as a stable and sovereign state. The constructive engagement of Burundi with the Peacebuilding Commission has laid the groundwork for establishing said legitimacy. The allocation of monetary assistance from the Peacebuilding fund has increased the legitimacy of Burundi as has international support for the peacebuilding process.

Burundi has made incorporating peacebuilding dialogue into the political arena a priority. Burundi is looked at as a state in the rebuilding phases and is gaining international, regional, and sub-regional legitimacy. This legitimacy is derived from the accomplishments of Burundi in upholding the peace agreements although the issues of decentralization and disarmament are still issues of the peace agreement which as of yet have not been fully realized.

The World Bank has agreed to grant Burundi a loan of 127 million dollars. As a condition of the loan, the World Bank has been asked by Burundi to focus its efforts on building good governance, and the World Bank intends to comply. In this capacity, the World Bank has instituted an anti-corruption and leadership program in Burundi. The World Bank loan is being accompanied by technical assistance in the hope that this will give the government of Burundi the opportunity to improve its governance structure.

As a sign of improvement, in reference to future elections, many political players in Burundi are rising to the challenge of good governance. There has been increased dialogue between the media, civil society and political leaders. There have been internal shifts in the ruling party toward more moderate political stances as well as an increased tendency for government committees to support opposition initiatives, a sign of developing bi-partisanship. These will be beneficial concerning the raising of confidence building measures in contrast to fears of corruption.

The issue of the incorporation of women into the governance process is one that has been examined closely in Burundi and upon which great importance has been laid. This process allows women to come to terms with their past victimization, as well as to contribute to the peacebuilding process with their unique perspective. Burundian women have suffered greatly during the course of the violence as victims of rape and the illicit use of arms against them. These offences in combination with the extreme poverty level have fostered a decrease in the life expectancy of women from 60 years to 39 years.

During the 2000 elections, the All Burundi conference was held in which the rights of women were a central issue. There was pressure for society to come to terms with rape, property issues, security and the education of girls and women. Burundi has implemented a 30% requirement that major government structures and institutions must employ 30% of its seats to women. 35% of those allocated seats are in sectors that are not considered to be traditionally soft areas of government.

The European Union is playing a particularly significant role in the peacebuilding process of Burundi, specifically in the area of good governance. The European Community Programs will be contributing 22 Million dollars for the improvement of good governance practices. These practices include promoting the rule of law, promoting transparency especially in the management of natural resources, and decentralization. As of yet, there has been an extreme centralization of the economic, political, and social sectors.

The movement towards good governance in Burundi includes incorporating the goals outlined in the Poverty Reduction Strategy Paper. Belgium, among other donors, is playing a significant role in ensuring that the provisions of the PRSP are carried out. Belgium is contributing 60 million euros for peacebuilding and one fourth of the funds are allocated to Burundi. These funds will be used to promote justice and the rule of law, for police training and decentralization for local development plans.

Further Steps to be Taken
A recent survey of Burundians asked what peace in Burundi would mean to the people. An overwhelming number of Burundians cited the ability to eat one meal a day as the number one indicator of peace in their country. To be able to travel without fear and to relate to others without fear were also mentioned as primary indicators of a successful peace process. This response by the Burundian people demonstrates the sever nature of the humanitarian crisis in Burundi.

Burundi cannot build a successful civil society without impunity for past acts and atrocities committed during the violence, as such, the promotion of transitional justice is one area of governance which should be made a priority in Burundi. Peace can only be built on the rule of law. There are several avenues that Burundi may take to ensure that the rule of law is upheld, whether through the Truth and Reconciliation Committee, new courts to be established, or through the existing courts and means.

The Peacebuilding Commission must promote the basic understanding of the link between the government and the people. This allows for the peaceful redress of grievances, draws all people into dialogue and focuses the role of civil society. The Peacebuilding Commission, Burundi, and the international community must not allow issues such as who is in control and sovereignty to hinder the movement toward peaceful democratization as a tool rather than violence along ethnic lines.

Burundi has no intention of regressing. The main concern of Burundi, currently, is to feed its people. Reconciliation is also a goal as it will bring total and lasting peace. The healthcare system, and educational opportunities for all children among other social and economic development initiatives are also priorities to good governance in Burundi. Politically, Burundi must strengthen the national assemblies and the parliament. The parliament is a very young institution as it was established by the Arusha Accords in 2000. The parliament has a positivist, inclusionary measure for both ethnic groups and women. The main question of the parliament is how to put the provisions of the constitution into action.

Burundi asks the international community not to place too many road blocks, conditions, or obligations as the country still needs time to grow. The ambassador from Burundi urged the international community to “come and lead us by the hand.” One way in which assistance is welcome is in the form of increased inclusion of the international community in the development of Burundi’s political and social sectors as both a goal and a means of peacebuilding. There needs to be an increased involvement of local and regional donors. Maintaining the two tier balance of power, both between Burundi and the international community and within Burundi, is crucial to the promotion of peace through good governance.

--------------------------------------

Prepared by Ashley Hatchel


Latest Updates

The Council on Foreign Relations posts video talk on Security Council Reform
On 11 January 2012 the Council on Foreign Relations posted a video talk by Stewart M. Patrick on Security Council Reform, entitled “UN Security Council Reform: Is it Time?”. Click here to watch the video talk on the CFR website

Meeting on General Assembly Revitalization 1 December 2011
By Mie Hansen, 5 January 2012
On 1 December 2011 the General Assembly met to discuss Agenda Item 120: Implementation of the Resolutions of the United Nations and Agenda Item 121: Revitalization of the Work of the General Assembly.
This article provides an overview of the debate.

Former consultant with the Center for UN Reform Education wins prestigious award
By Thomas Colerick, 13 December 2011

Meeting in the General Assembly on Security Council Reform, 8 and 9 November 2011
By Mie Hansen, 7 December 2011
On 8 and 9 November 2011 the 51st and 52nd plenary meetings of the 66th General Assembly session were held with a discussion of Agenda Item 122: Question of equitable representation on and increase in the membership of the Security Council and related matters. This article gives an overview of the debate and the statements made during the meetings, as well as an update on the developments in regard to Security Council reform leading up to the debate.

The 2011 Annual Report of the Human Rights Council
By Thomas Colerick, 8 November 2011
The 2011 Annual Report of the Council is now available.

Highlights of the Human Rights Council’s 18th Regular session
By Thomas Colerick, 11 October 2011

New report on the Human Rights Council’s fifth year
By Thomas Colerick, 4 October 2011

The Human Rights Council’s 18th Session (12-30 September 2011)
By Thomas Colerick, 28 September 2011

Update on Revitalization of the General Assembly: A RECAP OF DEVELOPMENTS DURING THE 65th GA SESSION
By Mie Hansen, 27 September 2011
Even before heads of state from around the world gathered last week at UN headquarters in New York for the opening of the 66th annual session of the UN General Assembly, the world’s main deliberative body, continuation of the ongoing negotiations to make the Assembly more effective, efficient and relevant were assured for yet another year. Member States have been discussing the “Revitalization of the General Assembly” for the past twenty years, but according to some critics only minor improvements have been made, leaving deep-seated reforms untouched. Even though all Member States seem to agree that reform of the Assembly is vital, recent developments confirm that it is still very difficult to reach an agreement on what should be done.

Chronology: The Human Rights Council – elections, sessions and important developments
By Thomas Colerick, 23 September 2011
As the Center for UN Reform Education once again will be covering the Human Rights Council more systematically, this chronology of the Council is provided. It includes elections, selected sessions and major developments and takes the reader from the Council’s birth in 2006 to today where the Council is currently holding its 18th Session in Geneva, Switzerland.



Panel on Improving Security Council Working Methods
On 23 June 2011, The Center for UN Reform Education held a panel discussion on “Improving the Working Methods of the Security Council”. The basis for the discussion was the most recent version of the S5 draft proposal on Reforming the Working Methods of the Security Council.



Qatar hosts workshop on Security Council Reform
On 12 & 13 May 2011, Qatar hosted a workshop on Security Council Reform in Doha. Lydia Swart of the Center was invited and she shared ten observations on this key reform process.

To move the process along, Member States, the Chair of the Intergovernmental Negotiations, and/or the President of the General Assembly will need to provide leadership by proposing a timeline/trajectory for the negotiations and by formulating a compromise solution that can garner support from all factions.



S5 presents draft resolution on Improving the Working Methods of the Security Council
By Mie Hansen, 2 May 2011
On 14 April, 2011, the Small Five Group (S5), consisting of Costa Rica, Jordan, Liechtenstein, Singapore and Switzerland, presented a draft resolution for Improving the Working Methods of the Security Council. The resolution was presented under agenda item 115 of the General Assembly (GA) that deals with follow-up to the outcome of the Millennium Summit. The S5 had presented its first draft resolution on the topic (A/60/L.49) in 2006 also as follow-up to the 2000/2005 Summits.

Update on Security Council Reform
By Mie Hansen, 5 April 2011
Since the Center’s latest update of 22 June 2010, Members States conducted text-based negotiations on 21 October 2010, 11 November 2010, 14 December 2010, and on 2 March 2011 in their efforts to reform the Security Council. Some countries apparently continue to slow down the negotiations, while others may push for a vote sooner rather than later.

Book Launch, The Group of 77: Perspectives on its Role in the UN General Assembly.
25 April 2011
Pictured from right to left: Center President William R. Pace, Minister Marcelo Suarez Salvia from Argentina (current G77 Chair), Ambassador Maged Abdelaziz of Egypt, Ambassador Herman Schaper of the Netherlands, and co-author Lydia Swart. For their remarks, click here: Minister Suarez, Ambassador Schaper, Ambassador Abdelaziz (pending) and Lydia Swart.





Text-based Negotiations in Full Swing
22 June 2010
On June 16th the negotiations on Security Council reform proceeded with the third meeting of the fifth round. The meeting aimed at getting member states to discuss specific language on the fourth “key issue”. Many countries seemed to have misunderstood the intention of the Chair, however, and restated their positions rather than making suggestions for specific changes to the document at hand.

Potentially Historic Text on Security Council Reform
By Jakob Lund, 13 May 2010
On May 10th, Zahir Tanin, the Chair of the intergovernmental negotiations on the question of equitable representation and increase in the membership of the Security Council and other matters related to the Security Council, sent out a long-awaited fax to all member states containing a “negotiation text”. The text and the annex can be accessed on the website of the PGA. The text includes the proposals sent by member states to Tanin's office since he opened the process of moving towards a text-based solution.

Open Debate on the Working Methods of the Security Council
By Jakob Silas Lund, 28 April 2010
On April 22nd, the Security Council’s Informal Working Group on Documentation and Other Procedural Issues held an open debate on the working methods of the Council. The debate raised some key questions that are relevant to the ongoing Security Council reform negotiations. Furthermore, to keep the issue of its working methods on the agenda of the Security Council is, in and of itself, an accomplishment.

A New Phase in Security Council Reform Has Started
10 February, 2010
On February 5th, the Chair of the intergovernmental negotiations on Security Council reform, Ambassador Tanin of Afghanistan, sent out a letter to all member states with an attachment of sixty pages. The document (available here and here) includes all “substantive input” submitted by Member States to the Chair thus far in the fourth round of negotiations. This marks the beginning of the fifth round, which, for the first time, will be text-based.

Moving Towards Text-Based Negotiations?
By Jakob Silas Lund, 21 January 2010
The previous month was an eventful one in terms of the Security Council reform process. On December 23rd, a group of countries sent a letter to the Chair of the intergovernmental negotiations, Ambassador Tanin of Afghanistan, urging him to present a composite paper. Following that, Tanin received a number of other letters concerning the process and on January 14th he replied with his own letter to all member states. This all culminated in the latest round of negotiations on January 19th and 20th in which the consequences of the letter exchanges were discussed.

Pros and Cons of Security Council reform
By Jakob Silas Lund, 19 January 2010
Through extensive interviews with experts as well as current and former Ambassadors and diplomats who have been close to the reform process, this article outlines and analyzes the advantages and disadvantages of the components incorporated in the proposals currently on the table.

The Long and Winding Road
by Jakob Silas Lund, 11 December, 2009
On November 16th, the chair of the intergovernmental negotiations on Security Council reform, Ambassador Zahir Tanin of Afghanistan, sent a letter to all member states inviting them to the first meeting of the fourth round of negotiations. The negotiations ended up spanning over two days rather than the planned one-day session.