PBC Ad-Hoc Working Group discusses NGO participation in PBC meetings

On 23 May 2007, the Peacebuilding Commission held an informal meeting to discuss “Provisional Guidelines for the Participation of Civil Society in Meetings of the Peacebuilding Commission.” These provisions would allow and encourage the involvement of civil society and non-governmental organizations in the PBC’s formal and informal meetings. Though some doubts and misgivings were expressed, delegates representing Brazil, China, Croatia, Egypt, Germany, Ghana, Jamaica, Japan, the Netherlands, Pakistan, Russia and the United States all seemed to agree that this document was a “workable compromise” to be voted on June 6th and should be reviewed after six months of operation. A number of NGOs apparently do not welcome these guidelines and prefer the ad hoc arrangements that are in place at other UN bodies.*

Issues raised at the informal meeting included:

  1. A number of Member States stated that though the guidelines provide a good foundation, the participation of NGOs will require additional clarification and criteria will have to be further developed;
  2. One Member State indicated that the revised guidelines resolved their earlier concerns;
  3. One Member State expressed misgivings about encouraging NGOs to be on national delegations;
  4. Another Member State stated that the PBC should avoid being manipulated by civil society for local political purposes;
  5. One Member State expressed concern that the rules and procedures might be burdensome to some NGOs.
  6. In States just exiting conflict, it might be difficult for NGOs to meet the requirements in Annex 2.
  7. There was agreement that in Section A.2., "chairperson" would not necessarily refer to a "person" as the authority could be delegated.
  8. It was noted that NGOs would not have to be nationals to be considered.
Ad Hoc Working Group on Pending Issues: DRAFT Guidelines 5/22/2007

Provisional Guidelines for the Participation of Civil Society in Meetings of the Peacebuilding Commission*

I. General Guiding Principles

In conformity with General Assembly resolution 60/180 and Security Council resolution 1645 (2005), and as envisaged in the Rules of Procedure of the Peacebuilding Commission;

1. The Commission recognizes the important contribution of civil society, including non-governmental organizations and the private sector, to all stages of peacebuilding efforts, as one of the main purposes of the Commission is to bring together all relevant actors, in particular national stakeholders.
2. The Commission reaffirms the important role of women and women’s organizations in the prevention and resolution of conflicts and in peacebuilding and stresses the importance of their equal participation and full involvement in all relevant peacebuilding efforts.
3. The Commission, in consultation with the government of the countries under consideration, shall encourage and ensure greater participation of civil society organizations and representatives from the countries under consideration.
4. Bearing in mind that circumstances are specific to each country under consideration, and also that there is no one model for organizing meetings in country-specific configurations, this process should be transparent, flexible and inclusive to all relevant parties.
5. In recognition of the intergovernmental nature of the Commission, active participation of civil society organizations and representatives therein, while welcome, does not entail a negotiating role.

II. Modalities of Attendance and Participation

Attendance and participation of civil society organizations and representatives in the world of the Commission would be through different modalities, as follows:

A. Formal Meetings of the Peacebuilding Commission

1. The Chairperson of the Organizational Committee or the Coordinator of the respective configuration, in consultation with the members of the Organizational Committee, shall invite representatives of civil society organizations which are actively engaged in peacebuilding activities, to make oral statements and provide information, as may be needed, that would contribute to the work of the Commission on specific matters within the scope of their activities pertaining to integrated strategies for post-conflict peacebuilding.

2. Prior to extending invitations, the Chairperson or the Coordinator shall circulate to the members of the Organizational Committee the names of civil society organizations and representatives proposed to participate, together with available background information on the basis of the elements contained in Annex 1.

3. The inclusion of civil society organizations and representatives on the list of participants shall be in accordance with the principles provided for in Annex 2. Should a member raise an objection to the participation of a given organization or representatives, the Chairperson shall engage in consultations with the aim of reaching consensus on the final list no later than one week before the meeting. The list shall include self-selected civil society representatives from the respective country under consideration.

4. In this regard, the Commission shall encourage civil society organizations from the country under consideration to nominate its representatives through a local independent self-selecting process, to be included on the list of participants, and shall encourage the participation of these representatives in the national delegation.

B. Informal Meetings of the Peacebuilding Commission

1. The Chairperson shall encourage relevant actors to interact and provide input to technical-level informal discussions of specific sectoral areas or thematic topics that may be organized outside the formal country-specific configuration.

2. Prior to formal meetings of country-specific configurations, the Chairperson, in consultation with members of the Organizational Committee, shall convene public informal meetings with representatives of civil society organizations to exchange views on peacebuilding issues relevant to the country under consideration. The Chairperson shall prepare a summary of the discussion for submission to the respective country-specific configuration.

3. Following formal meetings of country-specific configurations, the Chairperson, in consultation with members of the Organizational Committee, may convene public informal briefings with representatives of civil society organizations engaged in peacebuilding activities in the country under consideration in order to further exchange views on possible areas of contribution of those organizations in the implementation and follow-up of the recommendations of the formal meetings of the respective country-specific configuration. The Chairperson shall prepare a summary of the discussions for submission to the respective country-specific configuration.

C. Submission of Written Documents

The Chairperson may receive written comments, observations, or statements, and, with the support of the Coordinator of the respective configuration and the Peacebuilding Support Office, shall make best efforts to have the written submissions relevant to the work of the Commission available to the members of the respective configuration no later than one week prior to meetings on the subject under review.

III. Review

The guidelines contained in this document shall be subject to review and evaluation after six months from the date of their adoption by the Organizational Committee with a view to explore the possibility of their further development in light of the progress in the work and function of the Commission.

ANNEX 1

For the purpose of reaching consensus on the list of participants, the Chairperson, with the support of the Coordinator of the respective configuration and the Peacebuilding Support Office, shall also circulate to the members of the Organizational Committee available background information on the following:

1. An overview of the organization, its purpose, constitution and/or mission statement, or similar documents;

2. Summary of the present programmes and the activities of the organization undertaken in areas relevant to the work of the Commission and the country or countries in which they are carried out during the previous year;

3. The Organization’s sources of funding

4. Members of the governing body of the organization and their nationalities, including a brief biography of the organization’s representatives.

ANNEX 2

The inclusion of civil society organizations and representatives on the list of participants shall be guided by the following principles:

1. The organization shall have a democratic and transparent decision-making process, and operate in accordance with the laws regulating the activities of civil society in the countries of origin and in the country under consideration where appropriate.

2. The organization and representative shall be active in areas that are of direct relevance to the work of the Commission and can provide specific expertise and experience in peacebuilding upon which the Commission may wish to draw in consultations.

3. The aims and purposes of the organization shall be in conformity with the spirit, purposes and principles of the Charter of the United Nations.

* These guidelines apply to meetings of the Peacebuilding Commission other than in the Organizational Committee configuration. The guidelines are not meant to create a precedent for other organs of the United Nations.

The Peacebuilding Commission will vote on these provisions on 6 June 2007. Once they are established, the guidelines will be reviewed six months from the day enacted.

----------------------------

* For additional information, contact reformtheun.org
Prepared by Ashley Dittus

Please note that this summary is not an official account of the informal meeting


Latest Updates

The Council on Foreign Relations posts video talk on Security Council Reform
On 11 January 2012 the Council on Foreign Relations posted a video talk by Stewart M. Patrick on Security Council Reform, entitled “UN Security Council Reform: Is it Time?”. Click here to watch the video talk on the CFR website

Meeting on General Assembly Revitalization 1 December 2011
By Mie Hansen, 5 January 2012
On 1 December 2011 the General Assembly met to discuss Agenda Item 120: Implementation of the Resolutions of the United Nations and Agenda Item 121: Revitalization of the Work of the General Assembly.
This article provides an overview of the debate.

Former consultant with the Center for UN Reform Education wins prestigious award
By Thomas Colerick, 13 December 2011

Meeting in the General Assembly on Security Council Reform, 8 and 9 November 2011
By Mie Hansen, 7 December 2011
On 8 and 9 November 2011 the 51st and 52nd plenary meetings of the 66th General Assembly session were held with a discussion of Agenda Item 122: Question of equitable representation on and increase in the membership of the Security Council and related matters. This article gives an overview of the debate and the statements made during the meetings, as well as an update on the developments in regard to Security Council reform leading up to the debate.

The 2011 Annual Report of the Human Rights Council
By Thomas Colerick, 8 November 2011
The 2011 Annual Report of the Council is now available.

Highlights of the Human Rights Council’s 18th Regular session
By Thomas Colerick, 11 October 2011

New report on the Human Rights Council’s fifth year
By Thomas Colerick, 4 October 2011

The Human Rights Council’s 18th Session (12-30 September 2011)
By Thomas Colerick, 28 September 2011

Update on Revitalization of the General Assembly: A RECAP OF DEVELOPMENTS DURING THE 65th GA SESSION
By Mie Hansen, 27 September 2011
Even before heads of state from around the world gathered last week at UN headquarters in New York for the opening of the 66th annual session of the UN General Assembly, the world’s main deliberative body, continuation of the ongoing negotiations to make the Assembly more effective, efficient and relevant were assured for yet another year. Member States have been discussing the “Revitalization of the General Assembly” for the past twenty years, but according to some critics only minor improvements have been made, leaving deep-seated reforms untouched. Even though all Member States seem to agree that reform of the Assembly is vital, recent developments confirm that it is still very difficult to reach an agreement on what should be done.

Chronology: The Human Rights Council – elections, sessions and important developments
By Thomas Colerick, 23 September 2011
As the Center for UN Reform Education once again will be covering the Human Rights Council more systematically, this chronology of the Council is provided. It includes elections, selected sessions and major developments and takes the reader from the Council’s birth in 2006 to today where the Council is currently holding its 18th Session in Geneva, Switzerland.



Panel on Improving Security Council Working Methods
On 23 June 2011, The Center for UN Reform Education held a panel discussion on “Improving the Working Methods of the Security Council”. The basis for the discussion was the most recent version of the S5 draft proposal on Reforming the Working Methods of the Security Council.



Qatar hosts workshop on Security Council Reform
On 12 & 13 May 2011, Qatar hosted a workshop on Security Council Reform in Doha. Lydia Swart of the Center was invited and she shared ten observations on this key reform process.

To move the process along, Member States, the Chair of the Intergovernmental Negotiations, and/or the President of the General Assembly will need to provide leadership by proposing a timeline/trajectory for the negotiations and by formulating a compromise solution that can garner support from all factions.



S5 presents draft resolution on Improving the Working Methods of the Security Council
By Mie Hansen, 2 May 2011
On 14 April, 2011, the Small Five Group (S5), consisting of Costa Rica, Jordan, Liechtenstein, Singapore and Switzerland, presented a draft resolution for Improving the Working Methods of the Security Council. The resolution was presented under agenda item 115 of the General Assembly (GA) that deals with follow-up to the outcome of the Millennium Summit. The S5 had presented its first draft resolution on the topic (A/60/L.49) in 2006 also as follow-up to the 2000/2005 Summits.

Update on Security Council Reform
By Mie Hansen, 5 April 2011
Since the Center’s latest update of 22 June 2010, Members States conducted text-based negotiations on 21 October 2010, 11 November 2010, 14 December 2010, and on 2 March 2011 in their efforts to reform the Security Council. Some countries apparently continue to slow down the negotiations, while others may push for a vote sooner rather than later.

Book Launch, The Group of 77: Perspectives on its Role in the UN General Assembly.
25 April 2011
Pictured from right to left: Center President William R. Pace, Minister Marcelo Suarez Salvia from Argentina (current G77 Chair), Ambassador Maged Abdelaziz of Egypt, Ambassador Herman Schaper of the Netherlands, and co-author Lydia Swart. For their remarks, click here: Minister Suarez, Ambassador Schaper, Ambassador Abdelaziz (pending) and Lydia Swart.





Text-based Negotiations in Full Swing
22 June 2010
On June 16th the negotiations on Security Council reform proceeded with the third meeting of the fifth round. The meeting aimed at getting member states to discuss specific language on the fourth “key issue”. Many countries seemed to have misunderstood the intention of the Chair, however, and restated their positions rather than making suggestions for specific changes to the document at hand.

Potentially Historic Text on Security Council Reform
By Jakob Lund, 13 May 2010
On May 10th, Zahir Tanin, the Chair of the intergovernmental negotiations on the question of equitable representation and increase in the membership of the Security Council and other matters related to the Security Council, sent out a long-awaited fax to all member states containing a “negotiation text”. The text and the annex can be accessed on the website of the PGA. The text includes the proposals sent by member states to Tanin's office since he opened the process of moving towards a text-based solution.

Open Debate on the Working Methods of the Security Council
By Jakob Silas Lund, 28 April 2010
On April 22nd, the Security Council’s Informal Working Group on Documentation and Other Procedural Issues held an open debate on the working methods of the Council. The debate raised some key questions that are relevant to the ongoing Security Council reform negotiations. Furthermore, to keep the issue of its working methods on the agenda of the Security Council is, in and of itself, an accomplishment.

A New Phase in Security Council Reform Has Started
10 February, 2010
On February 5th, the Chair of the intergovernmental negotiations on Security Council reform, Ambassador Tanin of Afghanistan, sent out a letter to all member states with an attachment of sixty pages. The document (available here and here) includes all “substantive input” submitted by Member States to the Chair thus far in the fourth round of negotiations. This marks the beginning of the fifth round, which, for the first time, will be text-based.

Moving Towards Text-Based Negotiations?
By Jakob Silas Lund, 21 January 2010
The previous month was an eventful one in terms of the Security Council reform process. On December 23rd, a group of countries sent a letter to the Chair of the intergovernmental negotiations, Ambassador Tanin of Afghanistan, urging him to present a composite paper. Following that, Tanin received a number of other letters concerning the process and on January 14th he replied with his own letter to all member states. This all culminated in the latest round of negotiations on January 19th and 20th in which the consequences of the letter exchanges were discussed.

Pros and Cons of Security Council reform
By Jakob Silas Lund, 19 January 2010
Through extensive interviews with experts as well as current and former Ambassadors and diplomats who have been close to the reform process, this article outlines and analyzes the advantages and disadvantages of the components incorporated in the proposals currently on the table.

The Long and Winding Road
by Jakob Silas Lund, 11 December, 2009
On November 16th, the chair of the intergovernmental negotiations on Security Council reform, Ambassador Zahir Tanin of Afghanistan, sent a letter to all member states inviting them to the first meeting of the fourth round of negotiations. The negotiations ended up spanning over two days rather than the planned one-day session.