Home » Fifth Committee Report » 1-8 June 2007, No. 14

Fifth Committee Report: 1-8 June 2007

On 8 June 2007, the Fifth Committee concluded discussions on all issues except from DPKO reform. Amid the issues taken up by the Committee during the session, the Center for UN Reform tracked the negotiations on the strengthening of the oversight mechanisms of the United Nations, as well as negotiations on the budgetary requirements for the restructuring of the Department of Peacekeeping Operations (DPKO) based on the proposal of the Secretary General (A/61/858).

PDF Version

TERMS OF REFERENCE OF THE IAAC AND THE STRENGTHENING OF THE OIOS
On 8 June 2007, Fifth Committee delegates finally closed discussions on the draft resolution for the strengthening of the OIOS. The draft resolution also contains the terms of reference (TOR) for the Independent Audit Advisory Committee.

The TOR approved for the IAAC represent a compromise between all parties. Disagreements amongst Member States concerned the extent of independence of the Committee, and the criteria of membership and modus of election of its candidates.

With respect to the modus for the election of the members of the Committee, the idea of instituting a nominating committee was abandoned. Member States will instead propose 10 candidates, based on regional and geographical representation for the General Assembly’s approval. It is envisaged that regional groups will propose their candidates for the IAAC. The draft resolution recommends that the candidates be evaluated and attested through consultations with an external relevant institution, such as the International Organization of Supreme Audit Institutions (INTOSAI). The evaluation of the candidates would be made available to all Member States. Even though the draft resolution does not contain strong language in this regard, western countries would have wished for such referral to be obligatory, it is highly likely that candidates who have been attested and evaluated, by INTOSAI or other analogous organizations, will have a better chance to be voted on the Committee.

In regards to the possibility of re-election of members, which the western countries had opposed during consultations, it was decided that members will be appointed on the Committee for a term of three years with the possibility to have their membership renewed once. Members will thus be able to serve a maximum of 6 years each, with the exception of the first members elected, 2 of which will be appointed for 4 years with the possibility to renew their membership.

TOR for the IAAC will be reviewed in 3 years time and adjustments made when necessary.

As far as the strengthening of the Office of Internal Oversight Services, Fifth delegates agreed to the revised estimates as suggested by ACABQ. Thus, a few more posts have been approved for the audit and investigation section of the OIOS.

The discussion on the revision of the funding arrangements of the OIOS, which greatly contribute to the inefficiency of the office in carrying out its audit tasks, was deferred to the 62nd session of the GA.

Problems with OIOS funding arrangements:
During the general discussion at the Fifth Committee, the Under Secretary-General of the OIOS, Ms. Inga-Britt Ahlenius underlined how the main obstacle to OIOS independence is problems surrounding its funding arrangement for operations. According to the report on funding arrangements (A/61/810), two main issues need to be tackled in order to guarantee OIOS operational independence:

  1. The OIOS budget is subject to the review of the Department of Management which OIOS has oversight responsibility for;
  2. The OIOS negotiates funding for a third of its activities with the entities it is chartered to audit.

Such a funding mechanism has a negative impact on the independence of the internal audit activity since the funding condition allows the auditee to influence, if not control, the audit process. For further details, please see: Fifth Committee Report: Week of 7-11 May 2007.

The GA is expected to adopt the resolution shortly.

REFORM OF THE DEPARTMENT OF PEACEKEEPING OPERATIONS
On 6 June 2007, Fifth Committee delegates began general discussions on the restructuring of the Department of Peacekeeping Operations (DPKO) and financing of the Organization’s peacekeeping support account. The report of the Secretary General containing the proposals on how to strengthen the capacity of the United Nations to manage and sustain peace operations (A/61/858) was introduced by Under Secretary-General for the Department of Management, Alicia Barcena Ibarra.

  1. Statement by USG for Management on restructuring DPKO.

Under Secretary-General for Peacekeeping Operations, Jean-Marie Guehenno was also present. He aligned himself with the remarks made by USG Barcena Ibarra and stressed the fact that the proposals contained in the SG report, A/61/858, do not represent a rupture from the old peacekeeping operations management system but are based on recommendations advanced through the course of many years, such as those contained in the Brahimi Report and many others. He reassured Member States that the restructuring of the Department of Peacekeeping Operations is not intended to separate DPKO and Peacekeeping in general from the Secretariat. He added that the Department of Peacekeeping Operations (DPKO) and the new Department of Field Support (DFS) would work in close coordination within the framework established by the Secretariat and based on mandates approved by Member States.

The Under Secretary-General for Internal Oversight Services, Inga-Britt Ahlenius, introduced the Office of Internal Oversight Services (OIOS) Report on the Audit of DPKO management structures (A/61/743).

  1. Statement by USG for Internal Oversight Services on Audit report of DPKO management structure

The Chairman of the ACABQ, Rajat Saha, introduced the ACABQ report issued on 1 June 2007, A/61/937. The report comments on the SG's proposals and funding requests for the rearrangement of DPKO (A/61/858 and A/61/858.Corr.1).

ACABQ recommendations:
The ACABQ report based on the Secretary-General’s report on strengthening the capacity of the United Nations to sustain peace operations (A/61/858), comments on the proposals of the Secretary General for the restructuring of the Department of Peacekeeping Operations.

Among other recommendations, the ACABQ report warns Member States that the new organizational structure envisaged by the SG may present some major management challenges. In particular, the unusual arrangement of having the head of the Department of field support report to and take direction from the head of the Department of Peacekeeping Operations could create potential complications with respect to chain of command, accountability, coordination and maintenance of an adequate system of checks and balances.

The report also found several lacunae in the SG report while adding that structural change should not be seen as a substitute for managerial improvement. Outdated systems, inefficient and duplicative work processes, together with insufficient management attention are as much to blame for the difficulties the UN encounters in addressing the peacekeeping challenges than lack of personnel or inefficient structures. Further, the ACABQ report requests the SG to propose specific time-bound strategies to improve work processes and procedures. It also suggests that an analysis be carried out regarding the gains in efficiency and effectiveness, if any, resulted from past reforms enacted in the UN Logistics Base in Brindisi.

It also recommends that, in the context of the proposed budget for the support account for 2009/2010, Member States request the SG to review the work processes in relevant departments and DPKO with an objective to streamlining staffing and avoiding duplication of work.

Pending the outcomes of the analysis and further proposals on the improvement of work processes, the ACABQ deems it prudent to recommend provision for general temporary assistance positions rather than the establishment of posts in order to avoid institutionalizing functions that may not be required in the long term.

The ACABQ also warns that the substantial delegation of authority would result from the implementation of the SG proposal and it should be accompanied by clearly-spelled out authorities and explicit accountability measures.

The budgetary resources for the rearrangement of the DPKO suggested by the ACABQ for approval run short of $23,990,200 as opposed to the sum requested by the SG ($ 254,500,100).

Fifth Committee delegates are currently discussing the resources asked by the Secretary General to implement its proposals based on ACABQ recommendations. The draft resolution shall be submitted to the GA for adoption by the end of June.

For a full account of the general discussion and further background on the issue and related documents:

  1. BUDGET COMMITTEE TAKES UP SECRETARY-GENERAL’S PROPOSALS AIMED AT STRENGTHENING PEACEKEEPING, IN FACE OF GROWING DEMAND, COMPLEXITY, DPI Report, 6 June 2007

MEMBER STATES STATEMENTS

  1. Republic of Korea's Statement on DPKO reform, 6 June 2007

OTHER ISSUES

  1. Budget committee takes up review of special political missions, DPI Report, 1 June 2007
  2. Budget committee takes up draft text on financing for Lebanon force, DPI Report, 8 June 2007

------------------------------------------------

In case of errors or omissions please contact



Published in Fifth Committee Report, 1-8 June 2007, No. 14

AttachmentSize
Fifth Committee Report 1-8 June 2007.pdf56.41 KB
IAAC_OIOS draft resolution.pdf42.6 KB
» printer friendly version

Latest Updates

The Council on Foreign Relations posts video talk on Security Council Reform
On 11 January 2012 the Council on Foreign Relations posted a video talk by Stewart M. Patrick on Security Council Reform, entitled “UN Security Council Reform: Is it Time?”. Click here to watch the video talk on the CFR website

Meeting on General Assembly Revitalization 1 December 2011
By Mie Hansen, 5 January 2012
On 1 December 2011 the General Assembly met to discuss Agenda Item 120: Implementation of the Resolutions of the United Nations and Agenda Item 121: Revitalization of the Work of the General Assembly.
This article provides an overview of the debate.

Former consultant with the Center for UN Reform Education wins prestigious award
By Thomas Colerick, 13 December 2011

Meeting in the General Assembly on Security Council Reform, 8 and 9 November 2011
By Mie Hansen, 7 December 2011
On 8 and 9 November 2011 the 51st and 52nd plenary meetings of the 66th General Assembly session were held with a discussion of Agenda Item 122: Question of equitable representation on and increase in the membership of the Security Council and related matters. This article gives an overview of the debate and the statements made during the meetings, as well as an update on the developments in regard to Security Council reform leading up to the debate.

The 2011 Annual Report of the Human Rights Council
By Thomas Colerick, 8 November 2011
The 2011 Annual Report of the Council is now available.

Highlights of the Human Rights Council’s 18th Regular session
By Thomas Colerick, 11 October 2011

New report on the Human Rights Council’s fifth year
By Thomas Colerick, 4 October 2011

The Human Rights Council’s 18th Session (12-30 September 2011)
By Thomas Colerick, 28 September 2011

Update on Revitalization of the General Assembly: A RECAP OF DEVELOPMENTS DURING THE 65th GA SESSION
By Mie Hansen, 27 September 2011
Even before heads of state from around the world gathered last week at UN headquarters in New York for the opening of the 66th annual session of the UN General Assembly, the world’s main deliberative body, continuation of the ongoing negotiations to make the Assembly more effective, efficient and relevant were assured for yet another year. Member States have been discussing the “Revitalization of the General Assembly” for the past twenty years, but according to some critics only minor improvements have been made, leaving deep-seated reforms untouched. Even though all Member States seem to agree that reform of the Assembly is vital, recent developments confirm that it is still very difficult to reach an agreement on what should be done.

Chronology: The Human Rights Council – elections, sessions and important developments
By Thomas Colerick, 23 September 2011
As the Center for UN Reform Education once again will be covering the Human Rights Council more systematically, this chronology of the Council is provided. It includes elections, selected sessions and major developments and takes the reader from the Council’s birth in 2006 to today where the Council is currently holding its 18th Session in Geneva, Switzerland.



Panel on Improving Security Council Working Methods
On 23 June 2011, The Center for UN Reform Education held a panel discussion on “Improving the Working Methods of the Security Council”. The basis for the discussion was the most recent version of the S5 draft proposal on Reforming the Working Methods of the Security Council.



Qatar hosts workshop on Security Council Reform
On 12 & 13 May 2011, Qatar hosted a workshop on Security Council Reform in Doha. Lydia Swart of the Center was invited and she shared ten observations on this key reform process.

To move the process along, Member States, the Chair of the Intergovernmental Negotiations, and/or the President of the General Assembly will need to provide leadership by proposing a timeline/trajectory for the negotiations and by formulating a compromise solution that can garner support from all factions.



S5 presents draft resolution on Improving the Working Methods of the Security Council
By Mie Hansen, 2 May 2011
On 14 April, 2011, the Small Five Group (S5), consisting of Costa Rica, Jordan, Liechtenstein, Singapore and Switzerland, presented a draft resolution for Improving the Working Methods of the Security Council. The resolution was presented under agenda item 115 of the General Assembly (GA) that deals with follow-up to the outcome of the Millennium Summit. The S5 had presented its first draft resolution on the topic (A/60/L.49) in 2006 also as follow-up to the 2000/2005 Summits.

Update on Security Council Reform
By Mie Hansen, 5 April 2011
Since the Center’s latest update of 22 June 2010, Members States conducted text-based negotiations on 21 October 2010, 11 November 2010, 14 December 2010, and on 2 March 2011 in their efforts to reform the Security Council. Some countries apparently continue to slow down the negotiations, while others may push for a vote sooner rather than later.

Book Launch, The Group of 77: Perspectives on its Role in the UN General Assembly.
25 April 2011
Pictured from right to left: Center President William R. Pace, Minister Marcelo Suarez Salvia from Argentina (current G77 Chair), Ambassador Maged Abdelaziz of Egypt, Ambassador Herman Schaper of the Netherlands, and co-author Lydia Swart. For their remarks, click here: Minister Suarez, Ambassador Schaper, Ambassador Abdelaziz (pending) and Lydia Swart.





Text-based Negotiations in Full Swing
22 June 2010
On June 16th the negotiations on Security Council reform proceeded with the third meeting of the fifth round. The meeting aimed at getting member states to discuss specific language on the fourth “key issue”. Many countries seemed to have misunderstood the intention of the Chair, however, and restated their positions rather than making suggestions for specific changes to the document at hand.

Potentially Historic Text on Security Council Reform
By Jakob Lund, 13 May 2010
On May 10th, Zahir Tanin, the Chair of the intergovernmental negotiations on the question of equitable representation and increase in the membership of the Security Council and other matters related to the Security Council, sent out a long-awaited fax to all member states containing a “negotiation text”. The text and the annex can be accessed on the website of the PGA. The text includes the proposals sent by member states to Tanin's office since he opened the process of moving towards a text-based solution.

Open Debate on the Working Methods of the Security Council
By Jakob Silas Lund, 28 April 2010
On April 22nd, the Security Council’s Informal Working Group on Documentation and Other Procedural Issues held an open debate on the working methods of the Council. The debate raised some key questions that are relevant to the ongoing Security Council reform negotiations. Furthermore, to keep the issue of its working methods on the agenda of the Security Council is, in and of itself, an accomplishment.

A New Phase in Security Council Reform Has Started
10 February, 2010
On February 5th, the Chair of the intergovernmental negotiations on Security Council reform, Ambassador Tanin of Afghanistan, sent out a letter to all member states with an attachment of sixty pages. The document (available here and here) includes all “substantive input” submitted by Member States to the Chair thus far in the fourth round of negotiations. This marks the beginning of the fifth round, which, for the first time, will be text-based.

Moving Towards Text-Based Negotiations?
By Jakob Silas Lund, 21 January 2010
The previous month was an eventful one in terms of the Security Council reform process. On December 23rd, a group of countries sent a letter to the Chair of the intergovernmental negotiations, Ambassador Tanin of Afghanistan, urging him to present a composite paper. Following that, Tanin received a number of other letters concerning the process and on January 14th he replied with his own letter to all member states. This all culminated in the latest round of negotiations on January 19th and 20th in which the consequences of the letter exchanges were discussed.

Pros and Cons of Security Council reform
By Jakob Silas Lund, 19 January 2010
Through extensive interviews with experts as well as current and former Ambassadors and diplomats who have been close to the reform process, this article outlines and analyzes the advantages and disadvantages of the components incorporated in the proposals currently on the table.

The Long and Winding Road
by Jakob Silas Lund, 11 December, 2009
On November 16th, the chair of the intergovernmental negotiations on Security Council reform, Ambassador Zahir Tanin of Afghanistan, sent a letter to all member states inviting them to the first meeting of the fourth round of negotiations. The negotiations ended up spanning over two days rather than the planned one-day session.