Peacebuilding Commission adopts Strategic Framework for Burundi

On 20 June 2007, the Peacebuilding Commission held a country specific meeting focusing on the adoption of a Strategic Framework for Peacebuilding in Burundi. The document obtained approval following numerous discussions and presentations by delegates from the government of Burundi, experts in the area as well as members of the Organizational Committee of the PBC. The adoption of this document is notable for the PBC since it is the first document presented to the Committee since its inception.

The Strategic Framework for Peacebuilding in Burundi was the first document presented before the Commission and was thus seen as setting precedence for future endeavors of the PBC. The process of adoption included numerous consultations in “informal” informal meetings, country specific meetings, meetings of the Organizational Committee, presentations on lessons learned and experts who urged support for the document, as well as accounts from the government of Burundi. Both the PBC and the government of Burundi were satisfied with the document adopted.

Prior to acceptance of the document on 20 June 2007, the PBC met several times to discuss concerns over the various aspects of the framework, including, a section on implementing a monitoring mechanism. In the initial drafts of the Strategic Framework there were indicators for a monitoring mechanism but they were removed before the approval of the final document. The sections removed will be discussed during the summer. A mechanism for monitoring is an important aspect of the Strategic Framework so it will take time to work out the details. It has been scheduled for review in fall 2007.

A fixed timeline for implementing the Strategic Framework was also discussed during preliminary meetings. Some felt there should be clear benchmarks for actions to be taken in order to monitor the progress of peacebuilding. There was even the suggestion, in the initial draft of the Framework, to establish commitment by the PBC to Burundi until 2010. No consensus could be established on this issue so it was removed from the final Framework although it has remained a popular talking point among delegates of the PBC.

Another problem with the drafts of the Strategic Framework related to clarifying the role the PBC would take in actions following acceptance of the document. Drafts included commitments from International Financial Institutions (IFIs), NGOs, regional actors and civil society. PBC Members discussed how to regulate the involvement of outside actors and giving out responsibility.

It was also debated whether the PBC should adopt the document or just endorse it, since the document was drafted by the government of Burundi and not by the Commission. Finally, the Commission decided to adopt the document on the grounds that it would carry more weight in terms of enforcement and would set a stronger precedence.

At the adoption of the document, on 20 June 2007, Burundi asked that international involvement continue with the help of the PBC and to see the fulfillment of financial commitments made at the donor roundtable in February 2007. The issue of donors is one that was also mentioned by several Member States. The European Union, which had been one of the larger groups to pledge, took the time to reinforce their commitment to working with the government and meeting their promise.

The Executive Representative of the Secretary General in Burundi, Mr. Youssef Mahmoud, who has been placed on special assignment to monitor actions in Burundi, stated that he did not want to see any additional strategic documents developed since the government does not have the capacity to work intensely on another strategy and that the government should not be subject to another document process. He was specifically addressing the proposal to accompany the Strategic Framework with a follow up document, an Integrated Peacebuilding Strategy, which had been proposed by the Peacebuilding Commission during discussions.

Along with the Minister of Good Governance from Burundi, Mr. Venant Kamana, who pledged Burundi’s commitment to peace and national ownership of the process of peacebuilding, there was also a representative from civil society present, from Forum pour le Renforcement de la Societe' Civile (FORSC), Mr. Emmanuel Nshimirimana who confirmed that civil society is also highly committed to the process of peacebuilding and actions presented in the Strategic Framework.

Also under consideration with the Framework were modalities for transmitting the document to other UN bodies. The Chairman of the PBC meetings on Burundi, the Representative from Norway, proposed in the early stages a cover letter to accompany the adopted Strategic Framework. This cover letter would include information regarding the history of Burundi and the PBC’s involvement as well as the plans they have adopted for actions to be taken in the future, including monitoring work from the donor round table, establishing a monitoring mechanism, and setting time tables for review. The cover letter was decided upon by the PBC and accompanied the Strategic Framework when it was sent to the Security Council, General Assembly and ECOSOC on 20 June 2007.

At the conclusion of the meeting, there were still strong calls for more actionable benchmarks, clear timetables and a monitoring mechanism. An emphasis on sustainable development was also placed with Member States wanting to see support from the international community to sustain the economic and social needs of Burundi. Work with civil society would also be a consideration the PBC would like to take into account for the future. Overall, it was agreed by those present that the adoption of the Strategic Framework is not only a step in the right direction for the Peacebuilding Commission, but also for the UN as a whole.

---------------------------------------------
*This update is meant to be a summary of some of the main ideas discussed during the meetings and does not represent a complete and official account of all positions expressed by Member States.

Prepared by Ashley Dittus


AttachmentSize
Burundi_Strategic_Framework_20June_07.pdf92.61 KB

Latest Updates

The Council on Foreign Relations posts video talk on Security Council Reform
On 11 January 2012 the Council on Foreign Relations posted a video talk by Stewart M. Patrick on Security Council Reform, entitled “UN Security Council Reform: Is it Time?”. Click here to watch the video talk on the CFR website

Meeting on General Assembly Revitalization 1 December 2011
By Mie Hansen, 5 January 2012
On 1 December 2011 the General Assembly met to discuss Agenda Item 120: Implementation of the Resolutions of the United Nations and Agenda Item 121: Revitalization of the Work of the General Assembly.
This article provides an overview of the debate.

Former consultant with the Center for UN Reform Education wins prestigious award
By Thomas Colerick, 13 December 2011

Meeting in the General Assembly on Security Council Reform, 8 and 9 November 2011
By Mie Hansen, 7 December 2011
On 8 and 9 November 2011 the 51st and 52nd plenary meetings of the 66th General Assembly session were held with a discussion of Agenda Item 122: Question of equitable representation on and increase in the membership of the Security Council and related matters. This article gives an overview of the debate and the statements made during the meetings, as well as an update on the developments in regard to Security Council reform leading up to the debate.

The 2011 Annual Report of the Human Rights Council
By Thomas Colerick, 8 November 2011
The 2011 Annual Report of the Council is now available.

Highlights of the Human Rights Council’s 18th Regular session
By Thomas Colerick, 11 October 2011

New report on the Human Rights Council’s fifth year
By Thomas Colerick, 4 October 2011

The Human Rights Council’s 18th Session (12-30 September 2011)
By Thomas Colerick, 28 September 2011

Update on Revitalization of the General Assembly: A RECAP OF DEVELOPMENTS DURING THE 65th GA SESSION
By Mie Hansen, 27 September 2011
Even before heads of state from around the world gathered last week at UN headquarters in New York for the opening of the 66th annual session of the UN General Assembly, the world’s main deliberative body, continuation of the ongoing negotiations to make the Assembly more effective, efficient and relevant were assured for yet another year. Member States have been discussing the “Revitalization of the General Assembly” for the past twenty years, but according to some critics only minor improvements have been made, leaving deep-seated reforms untouched. Even though all Member States seem to agree that reform of the Assembly is vital, recent developments confirm that it is still very difficult to reach an agreement on what should be done.

Chronology: The Human Rights Council – elections, sessions and important developments
By Thomas Colerick, 23 September 2011
As the Center for UN Reform Education once again will be covering the Human Rights Council more systematically, this chronology of the Council is provided. It includes elections, selected sessions and major developments and takes the reader from the Council’s birth in 2006 to today where the Council is currently holding its 18th Session in Geneva, Switzerland.



Panel on Improving Security Council Working Methods
On 23 June 2011, The Center for UN Reform Education held a panel discussion on “Improving the Working Methods of the Security Council”. The basis for the discussion was the most recent version of the S5 draft proposal on Reforming the Working Methods of the Security Council.



Qatar hosts workshop on Security Council Reform
On 12 & 13 May 2011, Qatar hosted a workshop on Security Council Reform in Doha. Lydia Swart of the Center was invited and she shared ten observations on this key reform process.

To move the process along, Member States, the Chair of the Intergovernmental Negotiations, and/or the President of the General Assembly will need to provide leadership by proposing a timeline/trajectory for the negotiations and by formulating a compromise solution that can garner support from all factions.



S5 presents draft resolution on Improving the Working Methods of the Security Council
By Mie Hansen, 2 May 2011
On 14 April, 2011, the Small Five Group (S5), consisting of Costa Rica, Jordan, Liechtenstein, Singapore and Switzerland, presented a draft resolution for Improving the Working Methods of the Security Council. The resolution was presented under agenda item 115 of the General Assembly (GA) that deals with follow-up to the outcome of the Millennium Summit. The S5 had presented its first draft resolution on the topic (A/60/L.49) in 2006 also as follow-up to the 2000/2005 Summits.

Update on Security Council Reform
By Mie Hansen, 5 April 2011
Since the Center’s latest update of 22 June 2010, Members States conducted text-based negotiations on 21 October 2010, 11 November 2010, 14 December 2010, and on 2 March 2011 in their efforts to reform the Security Council. Some countries apparently continue to slow down the negotiations, while others may push for a vote sooner rather than later.

Book Launch, The Group of 77: Perspectives on its Role in the UN General Assembly.
25 April 2011
Pictured from right to left: Center President William R. Pace, Minister Marcelo Suarez Salvia from Argentina (current G77 Chair), Ambassador Maged Abdelaziz of Egypt, Ambassador Herman Schaper of the Netherlands, and co-author Lydia Swart. For their remarks, click here: Minister Suarez, Ambassador Schaper, Ambassador Abdelaziz (pending) and Lydia Swart.





Text-based Negotiations in Full Swing
22 June 2010
On June 16th the negotiations on Security Council reform proceeded with the third meeting of the fifth round. The meeting aimed at getting member states to discuss specific language on the fourth “key issue”. Many countries seemed to have misunderstood the intention of the Chair, however, and restated their positions rather than making suggestions for specific changes to the document at hand.

Potentially Historic Text on Security Council Reform
By Jakob Lund, 13 May 2010
On May 10th, Zahir Tanin, the Chair of the intergovernmental negotiations on the question of equitable representation and increase in the membership of the Security Council and other matters related to the Security Council, sent out a long-awaited fax to all member states containing a “negotiation text”. The text and the annex can be accessed on the website of the PGA. The text includes the proposals sent by member states to Tanin's office since he opened the process of moving towards a text-based solution.

Open Debate on the Working Methods of the Security Council
By Jakob Silas Lund, 28 April 2010
On April 22nd, the Security Council’s Informal Working Group on Documentation and Other Procedural Issues held an open debate on the working methods of the Council. The debate raised some key questions that are relevant to the ongoing Security Council reform negotiations. Furthermore, to keep the issue of its working methods on the agenda of the Security Council is, in and of itself, an accomplishment.

A New Phase in Security Council Reform Has Started
10 February, 2010
On February 5th, the Chair of the intergovernmental negotiations on Security Council reform, Ambassador Tanin of Afghanistan, sent out a letter to all member states with an attachment of sixty pages. The document (available here and here) includes all “substantive input” submitted by Member States to the Chair thus far in the fourth round of negotiations. This marks the beginning of the fifth round, which, for the first time, will be text-based.

Moving Towards Text-Based Negotiations?
By Jakob Silas Lund, 21 January 2010
The previous month was an eventful one in terms of the Security Council reform process. On December 23rd, a group of countries sent a letter to the Chair of the intergovernmental negotiations, Ambassador Tanin of Afghanistan, urging him to present a composite paper. Following that, Tanin received a number of other letters concerning the process and on January 14th he replied with his own letter to all member states. This all culminated in the latest round of negotiations on January 19th and 20th in which the consequences of the letter exchanges were discussed.

Pros and Cons of Security Council reform
By Jakob Silas Lund, 19 January 2010
Through extensive interviews with experts as well as current and former Ambassadors and diplomats who have been close to the reform process, this article outlines and analyzes the advantages and disadvantages of the components incorporated in the proposals currently on the table.

The Long and Winding Road
by Jakob Silas Lund, 11 December, 2009
On November 16th, the chair of the intergovernmental negotiations on Security Council reform, Ambassador Zahir Tanin of Afghanistan, sent a letter to all member states inviting them to the first meeting of the fourth round of negotiations. The negotiations ended up spanning over two days rather than the planned one-day session.