Mandate Review

Latest Updates

For the GA President's webpages on Mandate Review, click here. These webpages contain correspondence and the recommendations from the co-chairs.

Late 2008: It seems that the issue of mandate review will fade away, though it might be revived in the Fifth Committee. Among the reasons are probably the difficulty of costing mandates; fears from the South that it is an attempt to reduce the budget of the UN and the belief that this exercise belongs in the Fifth (budget) Committee; and narrow self-interest from some Member States who do not wish certain mandates to be reviewed.

On 8 August 2008, the Co-Chairs of the process, Ambassadors Rosemary Banks of New Zealand and Kaire Mbuende of Namibia released their status report on the results achieved during the 62nd GA session. They note that it would only be justified to continue the review if certain obstacles could be removed. The obstacles cited by the co-chairs are the "disconnect between the mandate and budget cycle" and the lack of clarity about which agencies are responsbile for implementing certain mandates. Member States are expected to meet before the end of the GA session to consider the report.

On 20 June 2008, "informal informals" were held on the Development of Africa cluster of mandates. The next meeting is tentatively scheduled for 7 July to make provisional decisions on the Development of Africa cluster. By that time, the operational or resource implications on the humanitarian cluster should be available. The next cluster will be on the the Promotion of Justice and International Law.

On 15 May 2008, an informal meeting took place which indicated that Member States agree with the Co-Chairs' recommendations on the Humanitarian Cluster and proposed process: The Co-Chairs will send the recommendations to the GA President who will forward them to the Secretary-General to determine financial and political implications.

Overcoming Roadblocks in the Mandate Review
By Lydia Swart and Faye Leone, 2 May 2008
In this interview, Ambassador Rosemary Banks from New Zealand expressed confidence in the mandate review methodology that she and her Co-Chair Ambassador Kaire Mbuende from Namibia recently developed; indicated what we might expect from the process in the next few months; and shed new light on some of our impressions of the political dynamics in the General Assembly.

Mandate Review Moves to Humanitarian Cluster with New Methodology
by ReformtheUN.org, 27 February 2008
The Co-Chairs presented a promising methodology to review mandates which they applied to the humanitarian cluster. With a new color-coded methodology devised by the Co-Chairs on Mandate Review, the General Assembly’s Ad Hoc Working Group on the issue voiced tentative agreement to move “from format to substance” in assessing humanitarian assistance mandates. Please see ReformtheUN.org's analysis via above link.

Update on Mandate Review: New “Way Forward” Discussed in General Assembly,
by ReformtheUN.org, 18 October 2007
The new President of the General Assembly, Srgjan Kerim, has yesterday announced the two co-chairs of the Mandate Review process and circulated a set of proposed parameters to take the Mandate Review process forward in the 62nd GA Session.

Member States Move Item to 62nd Session
17 September 2007
As Member States were unable to reach a compromise on the issue of Mandate Review, the agenda item was moved to the 62nd session of the General Assembly, which begins on 18 September 2007.

Mandate Review to be Resumed after Fifth Committee Session
by ReformtheUN.org, 20 June 2007
The General Assembly’s task of reviewing its mandates formally was re-initiated recently, but concrete progress has been postponed while the Assembly’s Fifth Committee is in session.

Mandate Review re-launched in General Assembly
by ReformtheUN.org, 20 April 2007
The General Assembly’s informal working group on Mandate Review met today to formally re-launch its work. This was its first meeting in 2007. The process resumed when the President of the General Assembly appointed a second co-chair to lead the process – Ambassador Kaire Mbuende, Namibia’s Permanent Representative to the UN. The other co-chair is Ambassador David Cooney of Ireland.

Letter of the GA President on the appointment on a new Co-Chair for Mandate Review
9 April 2007
Ambassador Kaire Munionganda Mbuende of Namibia was appointed as Co-Chair for the consultation process on Mandate Review. Letter from President of the GA available via above link.

Letter of the GA President on the continuation of the Mandate Review exercise
15 March 2007
GA President asks Ambassador Cooney to take process forward pending the appointment of Co-Chairs. Letter available via above link.

UN Webcast
UN Webcast, 20 February 2007
Ambassador Munir Akram of Pakistan, Chair of G77, on the group's agenda, UN Reform and Mandate Review.

Mandate Review Status Report and Informal Working Group to begin Phase II of the Review
29 November 2006
Member States agreed this week to begin Phase II of the mandate review with the thematic cluster on ‘Drug Control, Crime Prevention and Combating International Terrorism,’ following the preference expressed by the Group of 77 (G77).

Negotiations on Mandate Review stalled
11 October 2006
Consensus has not yet been reached on whether the Mandate Review process at the U.N. should move on to Phase II, namely beyond mandates older than five years and not renewed.

Co-Chairs Release Non-Paper
8 September 2006
Co-Chairs, Ambassadors M. Akram of Pakistan and D. Cooney of Ireland, released today a non-paper on guidelines and working methods on the way forward. Paper available via above link.

"Sluggish Progress on U.N. Mandate Review" UN REFORM WATCH NO. 18
by Irene Martinetti, 16 August 2006
Within the framework of the World Summit of September 2005, United Nations’ Member States decided that in order to strengthen the U.N. and update its program of work, the General Assembly (GA) and other relevant organs should initiate a review process of all U.N. mandates older than five years.

Background
A process to review all UN mandates older than five years started in June of 2006. It has the scope to update and strengthen the program work of the United Nations, ensuring that it corresponds to the requirements of the Member States. A mandate is defined as: “a request or direction for action by the United Nations Secretariat or other implementing entities in the system, which originates in a resolution of the General Assembly or one of the other organs.” To facilitate the process, at the request of Member States, the Secretariat has compiled an electronic inventory of all the mandates, originating from resolutions of the GA, the Economic and Social Council (ECOSOC) and the Security Council. The Secretary-General also issued a report entitled “Mandating and delivering: analysis and recommendations to facilitate the review of mandates.” The report provides a series of guidelines to be considered when reviewing the mandates, such as burdensome reporting requirements, overlap between and within organs, unwieldy and duplicative architecture for implementation and gaps between mandates and available resources.


AttachmentSize
GeneralAssemblyPresident_MandateReviewNonPaper_8Sep06.pdf140.58 KB
Status Report_Nov. 27.pdf1.04 MB
GeneralAssemblyPresident_MandateReviewNonPaper_8Sep06.pdf140.58 KB

Latest Updates

The Council on Foreign Relations posts video talk on Security Council Reform
On 11 January 2012 the Council on Foreign Relations posted a video talk by Stewart M. Patrick on Security Council Reform, entitled “UN Security Council Reform: Is it Time?”. Click here to watch the video talk on the CFR website

Meeting on General Assembly Revitalization 1 December 2011
By Mie Hansen, 5 January 2012
On 1 December 2011 the General Assembly met to discuss Agenda Item 120: Implementation of the Resolutions of the United Nations and Agenda Item 121: Revitalization of the Work of the General Assembly.
This article provides an overview of the debate.

Former consultant with the Center for UN Reform Education wins prestigious award
By Thomas Colerick, 13 December 2011

Meeting in the General Assembly on Security Council Reform, 8 and 9 November 2011
By Mie Hansen, 7 December 2011
On 8 and 9 November 2011 the 51st and 52nd plenary meetings of the 66th General Assembly session were held with a discussion of Agenda Item 122: Question of equitable representation on and increase in the membership of the Security Council and related matters. This article gives an overview of the debate and the statements made during the meetings, as well as an update on the developments in regard to Security Council reform leading up to the debate.

The 2011 Annual Report of the Human Rights Council
By Thomas Colerick, 8 November 2011
The 2011 Annual Report of the Council is now available.

Highlights of the Human Rights Council’s 18th Regular session
By Thomas Colerick, 11 October 2011

New report on the Human Rights Council’s fifth year
By Thomas Colerick, 4 October 2011

The Human Rights Council’s 18th Session (12-30 September 2011)
By Thomas Colerick, 28 September 2011

Update on Revitalization of the General Assembly: A RECAP OF DEVELOPMENTS DURING THE 65th GA SESSION
By Mie Hansen, 27 September 2011
Even before heads of state from around the world gathered last week at UN headquarters in New York for the opening of the 66th annual session of the UN General Assembly, the world’s main deliberative body, continuation of the ongoing negotiations to make the Assembly more effective, efficient and relevant were assured for yet another year. Member States have been discussing the “Revitalization of the General Assembly” for the past twenty years, but according to some critics only minor improvements have been made, leaving deep-seated reforms untouched. Even though all Member States seem to agree that reform of the Assembly is vital, recent developments confirm that it is still very difficult to reach an agreement on what should be done.

Chronology: The Human Rights Council – elections, sessions and important developments
By Thomas Colerick, 23 September 2011
As the Center for UN Reform Education once again will be covering the Human Rights Council more systematically, this chronology of the Council is provided. It includes elections, selected sessions and major developments and takes the reader from the Council’s birth in 2006 to today where the Council is currently holding its 18th Session in Geneva, Switzerland.



Panel on Improving Security Council Working Methods
On 23 June 2011, The Center for UN Reform Education held a panel discussion on “Improving the Working Methods of the Security Council”. The basis for the discussion was the most recent version of the S5 draft proposal on Reforming the Working Methods of the Security Council.



Qatar hosts workshop on Security Council Reform
On 12 & 13 May 2011, Qatar hosted a workshop on Security Council Reform in Doha. Lydia Swart of the Center was invited and she shared ten observations on this key reform process.

To move the process along, Member States, the Chair of the Intergovernmental Negotiations, and/or the President of the General Assembly will need to provide leadership by proposing a timeline/trajectory for the negotiations and by formulating a compromise solution that can garner support from all factions.



S5 presents draft resolution on Improving the Working Methods of the Security Council
By Mie Hansen, 2 May 2011
On 14 April, 2011, the Small Five Group (S5), consisting of Costa Rica, Jordan, Liechtenstein, Singapore and Switzerland, presented a draft resolution for Improving the Working Methods of the Security Council. The resolution was presented under agenda item 115 of the General Assembly (GA) that deals with follow-up to the outcome of the Millennium Summit. The S5 had presented its first draft resolution on the topic (A/60/L.49) in 2006 also as follow-up to the 2000/2005 Summits.

Update on Security Council Reform
By Mie Hansen, 5 April 2011
Since the Center’s latest update of 22 June 2010, Members States conducted text-based negotiations on 21 October 2010, 11 November 2010, 14 December 2010, and on 2 March 2011 in their efforts to reform the Security Council. Some countries apparently continue to slow down the negotiations, while others may push for a vote sooner rather than later.

Book Launch, The Group of 77: Perspectives on its Role in the UN General Assembly.
25 April 2011
Pictured from right to left: Center President William R. Pace, Minister Marcelo Suarez Salvia from Argentina (current G77 Chair), Ambassador Maged Abdelaziz of Egypt, Ambassador Herman Schaper of the Netherlands, and co-author Lydia Swart. For their remarks, click here: Minister Suarez, Ambassador Schaper, Ambassador Abdelaziz (pending) and Lydia Swart.





Text-based Negotiations in Full Swing
22 June 2010
On June 16th the negotiations on Security Council reform proceeded with the third meeting of the fifth round. The meeting aimed at getting member states to discuss specific language on the fourth “key issue”. Many countries seemed to have misunderstood the intention of the Chair, however, and restated their positions rather than making suggestions for specific changes to the document at hand.

Potentially Historic Text on Security Council Reform
By Jakob Lund, 13 May 2010
On May 10th, Zahir Tanin, the Chair of the intergovernmental negotiations on the question of equitable representation and increase in the membership of the Security Council and other matters related to the Security Council, sent out a long-awaited fax to all member states containing a “negotiation text”. The text and the annex can be accessed on the website of the PGA. The text includes the proposals sent by member states to Tanin's office since he opened the process of moving towards a text-based solution.

Open Debate on the Working Methods of the Security Council
By Jakob Silas Lund, 28 April 2010
On April 22nd, the Security Council’s Informal Working Group on Documentation and Other Procedural Issues held an open debate on the working methods of the Council. The debate raised some key questions that are relevant to the ongoing Security Council reform negotiations. Furthermore, to keep the issue of its working methods on the agenda of the Security Council is, in and of itself, an accomplishment.

A New Phase in Security Council Reform Has Started
10 February, 2010
On February 5th, the Chair of the intergovernmental negotiations on Security Council reform, Ambassador Tanin of Afghanistan, sent out a letter to all member states with an attachment of sixty pages. The document (available here and here) includes all “substantive input” submitted by Member States to the Chair thus far in the fourth round of negotiations. This marks the beginning of the fifth round, which, for the first time, will be text-based.

Moving Towards Text-Based Negotiations?
By Jakob Silas Lund, 21 January 2010
The previous month was an eventful one in terms of the Security Council reform process. On December 23rd, a group of countries sent a letter to the Chair of the intergovernmental negotiations, Ambassador Tanin of Afghanistan, urging him to present a composite paper. Following that, Tanin received a number of other letters concerning the process and on January 14th he replied with his own letter to all member states. This all culminated in the latest round of negotiations on January 19th and 20th in which the consequences of the letter exchanges were discussed.

Pros and Cons of Security Council reform
By Jakob Silas Lund, 19 January 2010
Through extensive interviews with experts as well as current and former Ambassadors and diplomats who have been close to the reform process, this article outlines and analyzes the advantages and disadvantages of the components incorporated in the proposals currently on the table.

The Long and Winding Road
by Jakob Silas Lund, 11 December, 2009
On November 16th, the chair of the intergovernmental negotiations on Security Council reform, Ambassador Zahir Tanin of Afghanistan, sent a letter to all member states inviting them to the first meeting of the fourth round of negotiations. The negotiations ended up spanning over two days rather than the planned one-day session.