Mandate Review Status Report and Informal Working Group to begin Phase II

29 November 2006

Mandate Review Status Report and Informal Working Group to begin Phase II of the Review with Cluster on Drug Control, Crime Prevention and Combating International Terrorism.

Member States agreed this week to begin Phase II of the mandate review with the thematic cluster on ‘Drug Control, Crime Prevention and Combating International Terrorism,’ following the preference expressed by the Group of 77 (G77). The first meeting of the Working Group will be held this Friday, December 1st. Phase II of the review exercise will entail evaluating all mandates older than five years that have been renewed. The fact that Member States finally agreed to move on to Phase II represents a significant step forward in the process, as the G77 had previously been insisting that the scope of the review, as expressed in the World Summit Outcome Document, was to be limited only to mandates older than five years that had not been renewed.

Earlier in the week, on 27 November, the finalized Status Report of the Informal Working Group on Mandate Review was circulated to Member States. The report provides a summary of the work of the Group with respect to Phase I of the Mandate Review process, during which all mandates older than five years and not renewed were evaluated. The Group, inter alia, designated 74 mandates as completed and deferred the discussions on the ‘Regular Programme for Technical Cooperation’ (RPTC) mandate to be assigned to an appropriate body for further analysis. The report also suggests that the Office of Internal Oversight Services conduct a review of the RPTC mandate.

With respect to the guiding principles for the current review, which were circulated on September 8th, further discussions will probably be needed as the G77 members have expressed concerns that they have not received sufficient assurance that politically sensitive mandates will not be addressed without having first consulted with the effected Member States. Also, especially with respect to mandates related to development, the G77 believes that better guidelines should be formulated on how to ensure that the review process can be used to add additional resources to mandates and not only as a cost-cutting exercise. Thus, the G77 has issued its own guidelines on how they believe the Review should be performed, which differs from the guidelines submitted by the Co-Chairs.

With regards to the working method of the Group for Phase II, Member States have been asked to come forward with a list of mandates belonging to the ‘Drug Control, Crime Prevention and International Terrorism’ cluster that they would like to see reviewed. There are 203 mandates belonging to the Drug Control cluster. The speed at which the Group will be able to conclude the review of this first cluster will depend on: the number of mandates that Member States bring forward for evaluation; how long it will take for the Secretariat to provide all the necessary information Member States need to be able to evaluate the effectiveness of the programs, use of the resources assigned and establish whether they have reached their objectives and to what extent they have contributed to drug control, thus reducing crime and/or international terrorism.

Once the review of mandates in the Drug Control cluster is completed, the Group will continue with the remaining three clusters selected for Phase II. Since CANZ (Canada, Australia and New Zealand), supported by the EU, had suggested that Phase II of the review begin with the cluster on ‘Effective Coordination of Humanitarian Assistance Efforts’, it is likely that the Informal Working Group will approach this cluster next.

However, the continuation of the Mandate Review exercise is constrained by an “expiration date,” December 2006. It is essential, at this stage, that Member States begin discussions on how to extend the time limit and re-examine its scope in the light of the experience acquired during Phase I. The current President of the General Assembly, H.E. Sheikha Haya Rashed Al Khalifa, has the task of initiating consultations with Member States on extending the time limit for the Mandate Review exercise.

Whether the Mandate Review exercise will be allowed to continue beyond the end of December 2006 will depend on how the process unfolds in the next few meetings dedicated to Phase II. In the first half of 2006, the G77 and China had expressed the view that Mandate Review should not be extended beyond its currently assigned time limit, but the Group has come a long way since the Putrajaya Ministerial Meeting, in May 2006, and there is some hope for a shift of position in this regard. Indeed, the G77 has already begun to show a certain degree of flexibility by agreeing to allow the review to proceed to Phase II. Thus, their agreement to extend the time limit to continue with the mandate reviews will probably depend on how the G77 perceives the exercise will be conducted. A key point is certainly to be the degree to which they see their own guidelines being taken into consideration by the Informal Working Group during Phase II.

More at ReformtheUN.org


Latest Updates

The Council on Foreign Relations posts video talk on Security Council Reform
On 11 January 2012 the Council on Foreign Relations posted a video talk by Stewart M. Patrick on Security Council Reform, entitled “UN Security Council Reform: Is it Time?”. Click here to watch the video talk on the CFR website

Meeting on General Assembly Revitalization 1 December 2011
By Mie Hansen, 5 January 2012
On 1 December 2011 the General Assembly met to discuss Agenda Item 120: Implementation of the Resolutions of the United Nations and Agenda Item 121: Revitalization of the Work of the General Assembly.
This article provides an overview of the debate.

Former consultant with the Center for UN Reform Education wins prestigious award
By Thomas Colerick, 13 December 2011

Meeting in the General Assembly on Security Council Reform, 8 and 9 November 2011
By Mie Hansen, 7 December 2011
On 8 and 9 November 2011 the 51st and 52nd plenary meetings of the 66th General Assembly session were held with a discussion of Agenda Item 122: Question of equitable representation on and increase in the membership of the Security Council and related matters. This article gives an overview of the debate and the statements made during the meetings, as well as an update on the developments in regard to Security Council reform leading up to the debate.

The 2011 Annual Report of the Human Rights Council
By Thomas Colerick, 8 November 2011
The 2011 Annual Report of the Council is now available.

Highlights of the Human Rights Council’s 18th Regular session
By Thomas Colerick, 11 October 2011

New report on the Human Rights Council’s fifth year
By Thomas Colerick, 4 October 2011

The Human Rights Council’s 18th Session (12-30 September 2011)
By Thomas Colerick, 28 September 2011

Update on Revitalization of the General Assembly: A RECAP OF DEVELOPMENTS DURING THE 65th GA SESSION
By Mie Hansen, 27 September 2011
Even before heads of state from around the world gathered last week at UN headquarters in New York for the opening of the 66th annual session of the UN General Assembly, the world’s main deliberative body, continuation of the ongoing negotiations to make the Assembly more effective, efficient and relevant were assured for yet another year. Member States have been discussing the “Revitalization of the General Assembly” for the past twenty years, but according to some critics only minor improvements have been made, leaving deep-seated reforms untouched. Even though all Member States seem to agree that reform of the Assembly is vital, recent developments confirm that it is still very difficult to reach an agreement on what should be done.

Chronology: The Human Rights Council – elections, sessions and important developments
By Thomas Colerick, 23 September 2011
As the Center for UN Reform Education once again will be covering the Human Rights Council more systematically, this chronology of the Council is provided. It includes elections, selected sessions and major developments and takes the reader from the Council’s birth in 2006 to today where the Council is currently holding its 18th Session in Geneva, Switzerland.



Panel on Improving Security Council Working Methods
On 23 June 2011, The Center for UN Reform Education held a panel discussion on “Improving the Working Methods of the Security Council”. The basis for the discussion was the most recent version of the S5 draft proposal on Reforming the Working Methods of the Security Council.



Qatar hosts workshop on Security Council Reform
On 12 & 13 May 2011, Qatar hosted a workshop on Security Council Reform in Doha. Lydia Swart of the Center was invited and she shared ten observations on this key reform process.

To move the process along, Member States, the Chair of the Intergovernmental Negotiations, and/or the President of the General Assembly will need to provide leadership by proposing a timeline/trajectory for the negotiations and by formulating a compromise solution that can garner support from all factions.



S5 presents draft resolution on Improving the Working Methods of the Security Council
By Mie Hansen, 2 May 2011
On 14 April, 2011, the Small Five Group (S5), consisting of Costa Rica, Jordan, Liechtenstein, Singapore and Switzerland, presented a draft resolution for Improving the Working Methods of the Security Council. The resolution was presented under agenda item 115 of the General Assembly (GA) that deals with follow-up to the outcome of the Millennium Summit. The S5 had presented its first draft resolution on the topic (A/60/L.49) in 2006 also as follow-up to the 2000/2005 Summits.

Update on Security Council Reform
By Mie Hansen, 5 April 2011
Since the Center’s latest update of 22 June 2010, Members States conducted text-based negotiations on 21 October 2010, 11 November 2010, 14 December 2010, and on 2 March 2011 in their efforts to reform the Security Council. Some countries apparently continue to slow down the negotiations, while others may push for a vote sooner rather than later.

Book Launch, The Group of 77: Perspectives on its Role in the UN General Assembly.
25 April 2011
Pictured from right to left: Center President William R. Pace, Minister Marcelo Suarez Salvia from Argentina (current G77 Chair), Ambassador Maged Abdelaziz of Egypt, Ambassador Herman Schaper of the Netherlands, and co-author Lydia Swart. For their remarks, click here: Minister Suarez, Ambassador Schaper, Ambassador Abdelaziz (pending) and Lydia Swart.





Text-based Negotiations in Full Swing
22 June 2010
On June 16th the negotiations on Security Council reform proceeded with the third meeting of the fifth round. The meeting aimed at getting member states to discuss specific language on the fourth “key issue”. Many countries seemed to have misunderstood the intention of the Chair, however, and restated their positions rather than making suggestions for specific changes to the document at hand.

Potentially Historic Text on Security Council Reform
By Jakob Lund, 13 May 2010
On May 10th, Zahir Tanin, the Chair of the intergovernmental negotiations on the question of equitable representation and increase in the membership of the Security Council and other matters related to the Security Council, sent out a long-awaited fax to all member states containing a “negotiation text”. The text and the annex can be accessed on the website of the PGA. The text includes the proposals sent by member states to Tanin's office since he opened the process of moving towards a text-based solution.

Open Debate on the Working Methods of the Security Council
By Jakob Silas Lund, 28 April 2010
On April 22nd, the Security Council’s Informal Working Group on Documentation and Other Procedural Issues held an open debate on the working methods of the Council. The debate raised some key questions that are relevant to the ongoing Security Council reform negotiations. Furthermore, to keep the issue of its working methods on the agenda of the Security Council is, in and of itself, an accomplishment.

A New Phase in Security Council Reform Has Started
10 February, 2010
On February 5th, the Chair of the intergovernmental negotiations on Security Council reform, Ambassador Tanin of Afghanistan, sent out a letter to all member states with an attachment of sixty pages. The document (available here and here) includes all “substantive input” submitted by Member States to the Chair thus far in the fourth round of negotiations. This marks the beginning of the fifth round, which, for the first time, will be text-based.

Moving Towards Text-Based Negotiations?
By Jakob Silas Lund, 21 January 2010
The previous month was an eventful one in terms of the Security Council reform process. On December 23rd, a group of countries sent a letter to the Chair of the intergovernmental negotiations, Ambassador Tanin of Afghanistan, urging him to present a composite paper. Following that, Tanin received a number of other letters concerning the process and on January 14th he replied with his own letter to all member states. This all culminated in the latest round of negotiations on January 19th and 20th in which the consequences of the letter exchanges were discussed.

Pros and Cons of Security Council reform
By Jakob Silas Lund, 19 January 2010
Through extensive interviews with experts as well as current and former Ambassadors and diplomats who have been close to the reform process, this article outlines and analyzes the advantages and disadvantages of the components incorporated in the proposals currently on the table.

The Long and Winding Road
by Jakob Silas Lund, 11 December, 2009
On November 16th, the chair of the intergovernmental negotiations on Security Council reform, Ambassador Zahir Tanin of Afghanistan, sent a letter to all member states inviting them to the first meeting of the fourth round of negotiations. The negotiations ended up spanning over two days rather than the planned one-day session.