Home » Fifth Committee Report » 28 March, No. 20

Fifth Committee Update - 28 March 2008

IS THE FIFTH COMMITTEE SUFFERING FROM A GOVERNANCE CRISIS?

After meeting for almost a month on important UN reform proposals, the Fifth Committee was unable to make substantive decisions on human resources, procurement, and strengthening the Department of Political Affairs (DPA), suggesting a growing governance crisis.

In regard to Human Resources Management (HRM) reforms, for instance, Japan and the US were insisting that they will need more information before they can agree to any of the proposals. Requesting more information hardly disguises their key concern - obvious to anyone attending the Fifth Committee - which involves the cost implications which amount to roughly 90 million for both streamlining contracts and harmonizing conditions of service for this budget cycle.

Suggesting that there is lack of information on HRM reforms is not very persuasive as the proposals began to be discussed in late 2006 and reports from the Secretariat, the Advisory Committee on Budgetary and Administrative Questions (ACABQ), and the International Civil Service Commission have been available for quite some time now. And for the Q&A sessions during the last month, the Secretariat had worked tirelessly – often throughout the night – to provide Member States with written answers to their questions. Not reaching agreement on any HRM reform proposals will likely undermine the faith of the Secretariat in the Fifth Committee’s working methods.

According to one source, some countries within the EU and the Group of 77 also expressed reservations about certain aspects of the HRM reform proposals but that, all in all, they remained willing to be part of a consensus agreement on this topic.

The Secretary-General’s proposal to strengthen DPA in respect to conflict prevention was deferred to the 63rd session in an informal meeting last evening. Again, concerns about resource implications from some of the biggest donors were underlying this deferral. Divisions within the G77 on this issue were rather apparent and arguably the G77 was saved from having to reach a common position because of the concerns about resources.

Part of the governance failure in the Fifth Committee is caused by the fact that the ACABQ is not able to provide the Fifth Committee with timely advice due to its heavy workload and the often late issuance of documentation by the Secretariat. Some suspect that the ACABQ itself is at times as politicized as the Fifth Committee. During the last few weeks, the ACABQ was unable to finish their reports on the proposed accountability architecture or the strenghtening of the development pillar at the UN.

In a few weeks, the Center hopes to provide a more in-depth analysis on the work of the Fifth Committee during its first resumed session. At this time, however, it seems clear to many insiders that Member States will have to address decision-making in the Fifth Committee soon, in particular in regard to:

  1. the amount of information Member States should reasonably seek from the Secretariat after they have already received detailed advice from advisory bodies (which probably asked to a large degree the same questions) - it is noteworthy that of the 15,000 pages of reports the Secretariat produces for Member States each year, more than half are for the Fifth Committee;
  2. the understanding that new activities or reform proposals will inevitably result in additional resource requirements;
  3. the establishment of reasonable and fixed timelines for the Secretariat and ACABQ for the submission of reports;
  4. the recognition that submitting many additional paragraphs for draft resolutions at the eleventh hour - thereby scuttling the negotiations - is disrespectful to the chair and other delegates. For reasons of transparency, it would be good practice for Member States to relay their strongest concerns on specific issues at the beginning of the drafting process of resolutions so that there will be enough time to reach consensus.

An ineffective Fifth Committee can do much harm to the credibility of Member States' governance role, in particular in regard to their duty to provide the Secretariat with timely guidance and adequate resources. It is more than ironic that some of the countries that are calling the loudest for management reform appear to be the least willing to pay for the costs involved.

For an account of the Fifth Committee's concluding meeting on 28 March, click on this DPI Report


Published in Fifth Committee Report, 28 March, No. 20

» printer friendly version

Latest Updates

The Council on Foreign Relations posts video talk on Security Council Reform
On 11 January 2012 the Council on Foreign Relations posted a video talk by Stewart M. Patrick on Security Council Reform, entitled “UN Security Council Reform: Is it Time?”. Click here to watch the video talk on the CFR website

Meeting on General Assembly Revitalization 1 December 2011
By Mie Hansen, 5 January 2012
On 1 December 2011 the General Assembly met to discuss Agenda Item 120: Implementation of the Resolutions of the United Nations and Agenda Item 121: Revitalization of the Work of the General Assembly.
This article provides an overview of the debate.

Former consultant with the Center for UN Reform Education wins prestigious award
By Thomas Colerick, 13 December 2011

Meeting in the General Assembly on Security Council Reform, 8 and 9 November 2011
By Mie Hansen, 7 December 2011
On 8 and 9 November 2011 the 51st and 52nd plenary meetings of the 66th General Assembly session were held with a discussion of Agenda Item 122: Question of equitable representation on and increase in the membership of the Security Council and related matters. This article gives an overview of the debate and the statements made during the meetings, as well as an update on the developments in regard to Security Council reform leading up to the debate.

The 2011 Annual Report of the Human Rights Council
By Thomas Colerick, 8 November 2011
The 2011 Annual Report of the Council is now available.

Highlights of the Human Rights Council’s 18th Regular session
By Thomas Colerick, 11 October 2011

New report on the Human Rights Council’s fifth year
By Thomas Colerick, 4 October 2011

The Human Rights Council’s 18th Session (12-30 September 2011)
By Thomas Colerick, 28 September 2011

Update on Revitalization of the General Assembly: A RECAP OF DEVELOPMENTS DURING THE 65th GA SESSION
By Mie Hansen, 27 September 2011
Even before heads of state from around the world gathered last week at UN headquarters in New York for the opening of the 66th annual session of the UN General Assembly, the world’s main deliberative body, continuation of the ongoing negotiations to make the Assembly more effective, efficient and relevant were assured for yet another year. Member States have been discussing the “Revitalization of the General Assembly” for the past twenty years, but according to some critics only minor improvements have been made, leaving deep-seated reforms untouched. Even though all Member States seem to agree that reform of the Assembly is vital, recent developments confirm that it is still very difficult to reach an agreement on what should be done.

Chronology: The Human Rights Council – elections, sessions and important developments
By Thomas Colerick, 23 September 2011
As the Center for UN Reform Education once again will be covering the Human Rights Council more systematically, this chronology of the Council is provided. It includes elections, selected sessions and major developments and takes the reader from the Council’s birth in 2006 to today where the Council is currently holding its 18th Session in Geneva, Switzerland.



Panel on Improving Security Council Working Methods
On 23 June 2011, The Center for UN Reform Education held a panel discussion on “Improving the Working Methods of the Security Council”. The basis for the discussion was the most recent version of the S5 draft proposal on Reforming the Working Methods of the Security Council.



Qatar hosts workshop on Security Council Reform
On 12 & 13 May 2011, Qatar hosted a workshop on Security Council Reform in Doha. Lydia Swart of the Center was invited and she shared ten observations on this key reform process.

To move the process along, Member States, the Chair of the Intergovernmental Negotiations, and/or the President of the General Assembly will need to provide leadership by proposing a timeline/trajectory for the negotiations and by formulating a compromise solution that can garner support from all factions.



S5 presents draft resolution on Improving the Working Methods of the Security Council
By Mie Hansen, 2 May 2011
On 14 April, 2011, the Small Five Group (S5), consisting of Costa Rica, Jordan, Liechtenstein, Singapore and Switzerland, presented a draft resolution for Improving the Working Methods of the Security Council. The resolution was presented under agenda item 115 of the General Assembly (GA) that deals with follow-up to the outcome of the Millennium Summit. The S5 had presented its first draft resolution on the topic (A/60/L.49) in 2006 also as follow-up to the 2000/2005 Summits.

Update on Security Council Reform
By Mie Hansen, 5 April 2011
Since the Center’s latest update of 22 June 2010, Members States conducted text-based negotiations on 21 October 2010, 11 November 2010, 14 December 2010, and on 2 March 2011 in their efforts to reform the Security Council. Some countries apparently continue to slow down the negotiations, while others may push for a vote sooner rather than later.

Book Launch, The Group of 77: Perspectives on its Role in the UN General Assembly.
25 April 2011
Pictured from right to left: Center President William R. Pace, Minister Marcelo Suarez Salvia from Argentina (current G77 Chair), Ambassador Maged Abdelaziz of Egypt, Ambassador Herman Schaper of the Netherlands, and co-author Lydia Swart. For their remarks, click here: Minister Suarez, Ambassador Schaper, Ambassador Abdelaziz (pending) and Lydia Swart.





Text-based Negotiations in Full Swing
22 June 2010
On June 16th the negotiations on Security Council reform proceeded with the third meeting of the fifth round. The meeting aimed at getting member states to discuss specific language on the fourth “key issue”. Many countries seemed to have misunderstood the intention of the Chair, however, and restated their positions rather than making suggestions for specific changes to the document at hand.

Potentially Historic Text on Security Council Reform
By Jakob Lund, 13 May 2010
On May 10th, Zahir Tanin, the Chair of the intergovernmental negotiations on the question of equitable representation and increase in the membership of the Security Council and other matters related to the Security Council, sent out a long-awaited fax to all member states containing a “negotiation text”. The text and the annex can be accessed on the website of the PGA. The text includes the proposals sent by member states to Tanin's office since he opened the process of moving towards a text-based solution.

Open Debate on the Working Methods of the Security Council
By Jakob Silas Lund, 28 April 2010
On April 22nd, the Security Council’s Informal Working Group on Documentation and Other Procedural Issues held an open debate on the working methods of the Council. The debate raised some key questions that are relevant to the ongoing Security Council reform negotiations. Furthermore, to keep the issue of its working methods on the agenda of the Security Council is, in and of itself, an accomplishment.

A New Phase in Security Council Reform Has Started
10 February, 2010
On February 5th, the Chair of the intergovernmental negotiations on Security Council reform, Ambassador Tanin of Afghanistan, sent out a letter to all member states with an attachment of sixty pages. The document (available here and here) includes all “substantive input” submitted by Member States to the Chair thus far in the fourth round of negotiations. This marks the beginning of the fifth round, which, for the first time, will be text-based.

Moving Towards Text-Based Negotiations?
By Jakob Silas Lund, 21 January 2010
The previous month was an eventful one in terms of the Security Council reform process. On December 23rd, a group of countries sent a letter to the Chair of the intergovernmental negotiations, Ambassador Tanin of Afghanistan, urging him to present a composite paper. Following that, Tanin received a number of other letters concerning the process and on January 14th he replied with his own letter to all member states. This all culminated in the latest round of negotiations on January 19th and 20th in which the consequences of the letter exchanges were discussed.

Pros and Cons of Security Council reform
By Jakob Silas Lund, 19 January 2010
Through extensive interviews with experts as well as current and former Ambassadors and diplomats who have been close to the reform process, this article outlines and analyzes the advantages and disadvantages of the components incorporated in the proposals currently on the table.

The Long and Winding Road
by Jakob Silas Lund, 11 December, 2009
On November 16th, the chair of the intergovernmental negotiations on Security Council reform, Ambassador Zahir Tanin of Afghanistan, sent a letter to all member states inviting them to the first meeting of the fourth round of negotiations. The negotiations ended up spanning over two days rather than the planned one-day session.