“A New Course in the World, a New Approach at the UN” Remarks of US Permanent Representative to the UN, Ambassador Susan E. Rice

By Daniel Safran-Hon, 20 August, 2009

On 12 August 2009 US Ambassador to the UN, Susan Rice, gave a speech at New York University’s Center for Global Affairs and the Center on International Cooperation outlining the Obama Administration’s multilateral approach to the UN.

A New US Multilateralism
For the United States, Ambassador Rice explained, multilateral cooperation is an invaluable instrument in dealing with the various transnational challenges facing the US in the 21st century. She argued that one of the major challenges would be to strengthen fragile democratic states. “There can be no security without development” said the Ambassador, while noting the importance of addressing basic issues such as poverty, health and education. The UN, she argued, would be one of the main tools to promote these issues. The multilateral regime is based on reciprocity and the US needs the cooperation of other states in this system noted Ambassador Rice. For this to happen, one of the first steps would be the US setting an example of responsible leadership. “National Security is not a zero-sum game” the Ambassador added and stated that a strong UN is a US interest.

Comments about UN Reform
In explaining the choice of the US to run, successfully, for membership of the Human Rights Council, the Ambassador noted that “real change does not come from sitting on the sidelines. Real change can only come through painstaking, principled diplomacy.”

On the UN budget, she said that paying what the US owed to the UN, thereby setting a positive example, would not only be an important step towards repositioning the US in a position of leadership, but also hopefully reinvigorate the United Nations. “As we call upon others to help reform and strengthen the UN, the United States must do its part—and pay its bills,” Ambassador Rice stated. “Our dues to the United Nations are treaty obligations, and we are committed to working with Congress to pay them in full and on time,“ she added while noting that the Administration would work towards ending the practice of paying arrears to the UN and other international organizations a year late.

In reference to management reform, the Ambassador said that “we push for serious reform. All the world’s citizens deserve a UN that runs right.” In doing so, the US, she stated, would work to strengthen the UN’s ability to deliver responsibly. “It’s not enough that costs be contained and funds spent without corruption; each dollar must serve its intent.“ She remarked that the UN system must confront head-on waste and abuse even as the organization struggles to meet its new responsibilities for peacekeeping, humanitarian assistance, and development. “The UN needs greater efficiency and effectiveness.” Ambassador Rice Also noted while underscoring that the aim should be “to ensure the UN has the management culture and leadership it needs to succeed.” The priorities of the US in this regard are “greater transparency and accountability, stronger ethics and oversight mechanisms, and buttressing Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon’s initiatives to overhaul the UN’s procurement and human resources practices.”

The Ambassador also highlighted the importance of the reform of peacekeeping operations (PKO) and gave an implicit endorsement of the “New Horizon” project lead by the Departments of Peacekeeping Operations and Fields Support. This project is aimed at strengthening operations by improving upon mandating, budgeting, deployment and reviewing. In her endorsement, she was consistent with the position she put forward at a hearing of the House Foreign Affairs’ Committee on 29 July, 2009. She noted to the audience at NYU that “UN missions have saved untold lives, averted numerous wars, and helped restore or establish democratic rule in more than a dozen countries.” But she also cautioned that the system is under severe pressure. “More than 115,000 military, police, and civilian peacekeepers are now deployed in 15 operations around the world—often in areas where there is hardly any peace to keep,” She said “So we need mission mandates that are more credible and achievable. We need peacekeeping operations to be planned expertly, deployed quickly, budgeted realistically, equipped seriously, led ably, and ended responsibly. And we need to strengthen the security sector and the rule of law in such places as Liberia and Haiti so that peacekeepers can return home certain that their missions are truly accomplished.” Ambassador Rice concluded this point by adding that the US will increase its “support to UN peacekeeping—including by being willing to contribute more U.S. military staff officers, military observers, civilian police, and other civilian personnel to UN missions and by refocusing the US Global Peace Operations Initiative on helping partner countries train their own peacekeepers."

In reference to the issue of System-wide Coherence and the anticipated reform of the UN’s Gender Structure, the Ambassador argued that “UN reform also means realizing the full potential of the majority of the world’s population: the world’s women.” Current UN instruments advancing the status of women are often uncoordinated, inefficient, and ineffective and must be strengthened she noted. “We are committed to a streamlined, empowered UN architecture to combat rape, sexual slavery, and discrimination and to secure universal rights, equality, and expanded opportunity for women. That will advance the cause of human rights, and it will advance security and prosperity as well.”

Analysis
Ambassador Rice set a high standard for the UN and its role in the international community in her speech. She also created high expectations from the US and consequentially towards President Obama’s speech in the opening of the 64th session of the General Assembly in September as well as to his administration’s approach to the UN in the future.

While the new administration has shown its reform intentions on some issues, such as PKO reform, it has yet to express and elaborate its positions on other important reform issues. Indeed, it is noteworthy that Ambassador Rice for instance did not even mention Security Council reform. Although the Ambassador has already expressed the will of the US to de-link Security Council reform from other reform issues – an indispensable, albeit very initial step towards further US engagement in the process, the Administration has yet to publicly elaborate on what an actual reform should look like.

Unless attributed to a specific source, all expressions of opinion are those of the author. The Center for UN Reform Education does not endorse any particular reform proposals.


Latest Updates

The Council on Foreign Relations posts video talk on Security Council Reform
On 11 January 2012 the Council on Foreign Relations posted a video talk by Stewart M. Patrick on Security Council Reform, entitled “UN Security Council Reform: Is it Time?”. Click here to watch the video talk on the CFR website

Meeting on General Assembly Revitalization 1 December 2011
By Mie Hansen, 5 January 2012
On 1 December 2011 the General Assembly met to discuss Agenda Item 120: Implementation of the Resolutions of the United Nations and Agenda Item 121: Revitalization of the Work of the General Assembly.
This article provides an overview of the debate.

Former consultant with the Center for UN Reform Education wins prestigious award
By Thomas Colerick, 13 December 2011

Meeting in the General Assembly on Security Council Reform, 8 and 9 November 2011
By Mie Hansen, 7 December 2011
On 8 and 9 November 2011 the 51st and 52nd plenary meetings of the 66th General Assembly session were held with a discussion of Agenda Item 122: Question of equitable representation on and increase in the membership of the Security Council and related matters. This article gives an overview of the debate and the statements made during the meetings, as well as an update on the developments in regard to Security Council reform leading up to the debate.

The 2011 Annual Report of the Human Rights Council
By Thomas Colerick, 8 November 2011
The 2011 Annual Report of the Council is now available.

Highlights of the Human Rights Council’s 18th Regular session
By Thomas Colerick, 11 October 2011

New report on the Human Rights Council’s fifth year
By Thomas Colerick, 4 October 2011

The Human Rights Council’s 18th Session (12-30 September 2011)
By Thomas Colerick, 28 September 2011

Update on Revitalization of the General Assembly: A RECAP OF DEVELOPMENTS DURING THE 65th GA SESSION
By Mie Hansen, 27 September 2011
Even before heads of state from around the world gathered last week at UN headquarters in New York for the opening of the 66th annual session of the UN General Assembly, the world’s main deliberative body, continuation of the ongoing negotiations to make the Assembly more effective, efficient and relevant were assured for yet another year. Member States have been discussing the “Revitalization of the General Assembly” for the past twenty years, but according to some critics only minor improvements have been made, leaving deep-seated reforms untouched. Even though all Member States seem to agree that reform of the Assembly is vital, recent developments confirm that it is still very difficult to reach an agreement on what should be done.

Chronology: The Human Rights Council – elections, sessions and important developments
By Thomas Colerick, 23 September 2011
As the Center for UN Reform Education once again will be covering the Human Rights Council more systematically, this chronology of the Council is provided. It includes elections, selected sessions and major developments and takes the reader from the Council’s birth in 2006 to today where the Council is currently holding its 18th Session in Geneva, Switzerland.



Panel on Improving Security Council Working Methods
On 23 June 2011, The Center for UN Reform Education held a panel discussion on “Improving the Working Methods of the Security Council”. The basis for the discussion was the most recent version of the S5 draft proposal on Reforming the Working Methods of the Security Council.



Qatar hosts workshop on Security Council Reform
On 12 & 13 May 2011, Qatar hosted a workshop on Security Council Reform in Doha. Lydia Swart of the Center was invited and she shared ten observations on this key reform process.

To move the process along, Member States, the Chair of the Intergovernmental Negotiations, and/or the President of the General Assembly will need to provide leadership by proposing a timeline/trajectory for the negotiations and by formulating a compromise solution that can garner support from all factions.



S5 presents draft resolution on Improving the Working Methods of the Security Council
By Mie Hansen, 2 May 2011
On 14 April, 2011, the Small Five Group (S5), consisting of Costa Rica, Jordan, Liechtenstein, Singapore and Switzerland, presented a draft resolution for Improving the Working Methods of the Security Council. The resolution was presented under agenda item 115 of the General Assembly (GA) that deals with follow-up to the outcome of the Millennium Summit. The S5 had presented its first draft resolution on the topic (A/60/L.49) in 2006 also as follow-up to the 2000/2005 Summits.

Update on Security Council Reform
By Mie Hansen, 5 April 2011
Since the Center’s latest update of 22 June 2010, Members States conducted text-based negotiations on 21 October 2010, 11 November 2010, 14 December 2010, and on 2 March 2011 in their efforts to reform the Security Council. Some countries apparently continue to slow down the negotiations, while others may push for a vote sooner rather than later.

Book Launch, The Group of 77: Perspectives on its Role in the UN General Assembly.
25 April 2011
Pictured from right to left: Center President William R. Pace, Minister Marcelo Suarez Salvia from Argentina (current G77 Chair), Ambassador Maged Abdelaziz of Egypt, Ambassador Herman Schaper of the Netherlands, and co-author Lydia Swart. For their remarks, click here: Minister Suarez, Ambassador Schaper, Ambassador Abdelaziz (pending) and Lydia Swart.





Text-based Negotiations in Full Swing
22 June 2010
On June 16th the negotiations on Security Council reform proceeded with the third meeting of the fifth round. The meeting aimed at getting member states to discuss specific language on the fourth “key issue”. Many countries seemed to have misunderstood the intention of the Chair, however, and restated their positions rather than making suggestions for specific changes to the document at hand.

Potentially Historic Text on Security Council Reform
By Jakob Lund, 13 May 2010
On May 10th, Zahir Tanin, the Chair of the intergovernmental negotiations on the question of equitable representation and increase in the membership of the Security Council and other matters related to the Security Council, sent out a long-awaited fax to all member states containing a “negotiation text”. The text and the annex can be accessed on the website of the PGA. The text includes the proposals sent by member states to Tanin's office since he opened the process of moving towards a text-based solution.

Open Debate on the Working Methods of the Security Council
By Jakob Silas Lund, 28 April 2010
On April 22nd, the Security Council’s Informal Working Group on Documentation and Other Procedural Issues held an open debate on the working methods of the Council. The debate raised some key questions that are relevant to the ongoing Security Council reform negotiations. Furthermore, to keep the issue of its working methods on the agenda of the Security Council is, in and of itself, an accomplishment.

A New Phase in Security Council Reform Has Started
10 February, 2010
On February 5th, the Chair of the intergovernmental negotiations on Security Council reform, Ambassador Tanin of Afghanistan, sent out a letter to all member states with an attachment of sixty pages. The document (available here and here) includes all “substantive input” submitted by Member States to the Chair thus far in the fourth round of negotiations. This marks the beginning of the fifth round, which, for the first time, will be text-based.

Moving Towards Text-Based Negotiations?
By Jakob Silas Lund, 21 January 2010
The previous month was an eventful one in terms of the Security Council reform process. On December 23rd, a group of countries sent a letter to the Chair of the intergovernmental negotiations, Ambassador Tanin of Afghanistan, urging him to present a composite paper. Following that, Tanin received a number of other letters concerning the process and on January 14th he replied with his own letter to all member states. This all culminated in the latest round of negotiations on January 19th and 20th in which the consequences of the letter exchanges were discussed.

Pros and Cons of Security Council reform
By Jakob Silas Lund, 19 January 2010
Through extensive interviews with experts as well as current and former Ambassadors and diplomats who have been close to the reform process, this article outlines and analyzes the advantages and disadvantages of the components incorporated in the proposals currently on the table.

The Long and Winding Road
by Jakob Silas Lund, 11 December, 2009
On November 16th, the chair of the intergovernmental negotiations on Security Council reform, Ambassador Zahir Tanin of Afghanistan, sent a letter to all member states inviting them to the first meeting of the fourth round of negotiations. The negotiations ended up spanning over two days rather than the planned one-day session.