Home

The long and Winding Road

By Jakob Silas Lund, 11 December 2009

On November 16th, the chair of the intergovernmental negotiations on Security Council reform, Ambassador Zahir Tanin of Afghanistan, sent a letter to all member states inviting them to the first meeting of the fourth round of negotiations. The negotiations ended up spanning over two days rather than the planned one-day session.

In his letter, Tanin encouraged member states to: “reflect on their own positions and proposals and on the positions and proposals of their peers.” This was seen as a step on behalf of the chair to narrow down the proposals and move towards actual negotiations rather than mere repeats of already stated positions. Expectations, therefore, were perhaps higher than is usually the case for negotiations on reform of the Council. Tanin did not play down those expectations in his opening speech. On December 8th, the 29th anniversary of John Lennon’s murder, Tanin proclaimed that he “may be a dreamer,” but that he was “not the only one” and referred to the member states’ “burning desire” to reform the Council. Judging from the statements on the floor, however, not all delegates had been listening to Imagine on their way to the Trusteeship Council, where the negotiations were held.

Permanency or Not
Brazil, Japan, India, and Germany and other member states reiterated their support for expansion in “both categories” (permanent and non-permanent). Portugal stated that expansion in both categories would bring the Council “into line with contemporary geopolitical realities,” while Brazil opined that it would lead to “greater legitimacy and effectiveness of the Council’s work.” Sierra Leone, speaking on behalf of the African group, restated their insistence on a minimum of two permanent seats for Africa as per the Ezulwini consensus. Along with Egypt and other African nations, Sierra Leone also maintained that these two permanent members must be elected by the African Union. Egypt added that the veto remains an issue that cannot be ignored and one that Africa will not back down on. Recently, rumors have had it that the African group might be willing to soften up on this issue, which may have been the reason Egypt came out so strongly. The UK expressed support for the G4 and Africa’s call for more permanent seats but also said that they were willing to consider the intermediate approach.

This was perhaps illustrative of how opinions among some member states have shifted towards at least reflecting on the intermediate model. Both Germany and Indonesia said that while they, as a principle, want expansion in both categories, they believe the intermediate approach may be the most constructive for now. The Netherlands suggested a version of the intermediate model with a review period of eight to ten years, while Slovenia suggested a twelve-year review period. Pakistan proposed an intermediate approach in which countries could hold long-term seats and be re-elected, an idea also supported by Italy. Italy further underlined, however, that the intermediate solution is a compromise approach leading to a compromise solution and that it can never end in permanency for any new member state. The fact that Germany and Italy can agree on supporting the intermediate solution with such different opinions about the end-result shows just how broad and vague the concept still is.

Working Document or Not
A dividing issue was whether to produce a text as basis for further negotiations. Brazil suggested that a proposal laid out by member states may be perceived as biased and suggested that Ambassador Tanin produce a working paper. Palau, India, Czech Republic, Germany and other states echoed this suggestion. Surprisingly, Spain, a member of the UFC, also supported the idea of a working document. Pakistan, on the other hand, stated that: ”any narrowing down of positions, based on erratic majority-minority logic would run counter to the spirit of negotiations.” They further warned Ambassador Tanin not to let his “shoulders be used to fire upon a specific target.” Italy said that proposals for negotiation documents would be unacceptable and “destined inevitably for failure.” Disregarding these negative sentiments, the Philippines resubmitted five draft resolutions (first submitted on June 22, 2009) on the issues of the veto; the jurisdiction of the GA; the working methods of the Council; and expansion of the Council in both categories.

The divide over whether or not to put a text on the table has roots in the perceptions of whether the necessary 2/3 majority exists in favor of any one proposal. Several countries, including India, Brazil, and Jamaica, referred to the “vast majority” in favor of expansion in both categories, while Pakistan and others opined that there is no “empirical basis for this calculus.” Turkey said that the “mindset that dismisses other views as minority” is becoming an obstacle to reform and added that it is “obvious that there is no sufficient majority behind any of the proposals.” Italy found the idea of a straw poll to be undermining democratic principles.

Working Methods
Judging from the exchanges on December 8th and 9th, reform of the working methods of the Council should be fast approaching. Virtually all members who spoke mentioned the working methods. Portugal said that while Presidential note 507 was adopted by the Council, the membership of the UN “still lacks a full understanding of the Council’s assessment of the implementation of that note.” Several countries, among them Egypt, praised the S5’s work on working methods reform.

Statements were made in favor of increasing the inclusion of Troop Contributing Countries in the decision-making process; improving the relationship between the GA and the Council; and for more transparency in general. Bolivia suggested getting rid of the veto altogether while some repeated the suggestion from the S5 of abolishing it in cases of genocide, crimes against humanity and serious violations of international humanitarian law. Venezuela, on the other hand, suggested granting the veto to all members of the Council—permanent as well as non-permanent—but to limit it to cases falling under chapter VII of the Charter. Regardless of this substantial support for working methods reform, however, the UFC demands that reform must be comprehensive (i.e. include all five key issues). This means that the P5 does not even have to object to the potential changes at this point, which expected to happen if a proposal was ever brought to the floor.

The Long and Winding Road
The Philippines said that statements had been repeated ad infinitum in the preceding three rounds of negotiations and urged its peers to not make this fourth round a “waste of time,” which would be “obnoxiously intolerable.” Whether the member states will hear the call from the Philippines is yet to be seen. This latest exchange did show that many member states have maintained a strong dedication and desire for their preferred version of reform. Whether there is an equally strong willingness to compromise and to seek solutions that can garner the necessary majority is much less clear. It remains a speculation whether this was just the fourth in a boxing-like epic match of 15 rounds. The process has indeed, in the words of Ambassador Tanin, been a long and winding road.


AttachmentSize
507.pdf153.22 KB
» printer friendly version

Latest Updates

The Council on Foreign Relations posts video talk on Security Council Reform
On 11 January 2012 the Council on Foreign Relations posted a video talk by Stewart M. Patrick on Security Council Reform, entitled “UN Security Council Reform: Is it Time?”. Click here to watch the video talk on the CFR website

Meeting on General Assembly Revitalization 1 December 2011
By Mie Hansen, 5 January 2012
On 1 December 2011 the General Assembly met to discuss Agenda Item 120: Implementation of the Resolutions of the United Nations and Agenda Item 121: Revitalization of the Work of the General Assembly.
This article provides an overview of the debate.

Former consultant with the Center for UN Reform Education wins prestigious award
By Thomas Colerick, 13 December 2011

Meeting in the General Assembly on Security Council Reform, 8 and 9 November 2011
By Mie Hansen, 7 December 2011
On 8 and 9 November 2011 the 51st and 52nd plenary meetings of the 66th General Assembly session were held with a discussion of Agenda Item 122: Question of equitable representation on and increase in the membership of the Security Council and related matters. This article gives an overview of the debate and the statements made during the meetings, as well as an update on the developments in regard to Security Council reform leading up to the debate.

The 2011 Annual Report of the Human Rights Council
By Thomas Colerick, 8 November 2011
The 2011 Annual Report of the Council is now available.

Highlights of the Human Rights Council’s 18th Regular session
By Thomas Colerick, 11 October 2011

New report on the Human Rights Council’s fifth year
By Thomas Colerick, 4 October 2011

The Human Rights Council’s 18th Session (12-30 September 2011)
By Thomas Colerick, 28 September 2011

Update on Revitalization of the General Assembly: A RECAP OF DEVELOPMENTS DURING THE 65th GA SESSION
By Mie Hansen, 27 September 2011
Even before heads of state from around the world gathered last week at UN headquarters in New York for the opening of the 66th annual session of the UN General Assembly, the world’s main deliberative body, continuation of the ongoing negotiations to make the Assembly more effective, efficient and relevant were assured for yet another year. Member States have been discussing the “Revitalization of the General Assembly” for the past twenty years, but according to some critics only minor improvements have been made, leaving deep-seated reforms untouched. Even though all Member States seem to agree that reform of the Assembly is vital, recent developments confirm that it is still very difficult to reach an agreement on what should be done.

Chronology: The Human Rights Council – elections, sessions and important developments
By Thomas Colerick, 23 September 2011
As the Center for UN Reform Education once again will be covering the Human Rights Council more systematically, this chronology of the Council is provided. It includes elections, selected sessions and major developments and takes the reader from the Council’s birth in 2006 to today where the Council is currently holding its 18th Session in Geneva, Switzerland.



Panel on Improving Security Council Working Methods
On 23 June 2011, The Center for UN Reform Education held a panel discussion on “Improving the Working Methods of the Security Council”. The basis for the discussion was the most recent version of the S5 draft proposal on Reforming the Working Methods of the Security Council.



Qatar hosts workshop on Security Council Reform
On 12 & 13 May 2011, Qatar hosted a workshop on Security Council Reform in Doha. Lydia Swart of the Center was invited and she shared ten observations on this key reform process.

To move the process along, Member States, the Chair of the Intergovernmental Negotiations, and/or the President of the General Assembly will need to provide leadership by proposing a timeline/trajectory for the negotiations and by formulating a compromise solution that can garner support from all factions.



S5 presents draft resolution on Improving the Working Methods of the Security Council
By Mie Hansen, 2 May 2011
On 14 April, 2011, the Small Five Group (S5), consisting of Costa Rica, Jordan, Liechtenstein, Singapore and Switzerland, presented a draft resolution for Improving the Working Methods of the Security Council. The resolution was presented under agenda item 115 of the General Assembly (GA) that deals with follow-up to the outcome of the Millennium Summit. The S5 had presented its first draft resolution on the topic (A/60/L.49) in 2006 also as follow-up to the 2000/2005 Summits.

Update on Security Council Reform
By Mie Hansen, 5 April 2011
Since the Center’s latest update of 22 June 2010, Members States conducted text-based negotiations on 21 October 2010, 11 November 2010, 14 December 2010, and on 2 March 2011 in their efforts to reform the Security Council. Some countries apparently continue to slow down the negotiations, while others may push for a vote sooner rather than later.

Book Launch, The Group of 77: Perspectives on its Role in the UN General Assembly.
25 April 2011
Pictured from right to left: Center President William R. Pace, Minister Marcelo Suarez Salvia from Argentina (current G77 Chair), Ambassador Maged Abdelaziz of Egypt, Ambassador Herman Schaper of the Netherlands, and co-author Lydia Swart. For their remarks, click here: Minister Suarez, Ambassador Schaper, Ambassador Abdelaziz (pending) and Lydia Swart.





Text-based Negotiations in Full Swing
22 June 2010
On June 16th the negotiations on Security Council reform proceeded with the third meeting of the fifth round. The meeting aimed at getting member states to discuss specific language on the fourth “key issue”. Many countries seemed to have misunderstood the intention of the Chair, however, and restated their positions rather than making suggestions for specific changes to the document at hand.

Potentially Historic Text on Security Council Reform
By Jakob Lund, 13 May 2010
On May 10th, Zahir Tanin, the Chair of the intergovernmental negotiations on the question of equitable representation and increase in the membership of the Security Council and other matters related to the Security Council, sent out a long-awaited fax to all member states containing a “negotiation text”. The text and the annex can be accessed on the website of the PGA. The text includes the proposals sent by member states to Tanin's office since he opened the process of moving towards a text-based solution.

Open Debate on the Working Methods of the Security Council
By Jakob Silas Lund, 28 April 2010
On April 22nd, the Security Council’s Informal Working Group on Documentation and Other Procedural Issues held an open debate on the working methods of the Council. The debate raised some key questions that are relevant to the ongoing Security Council reform negotiations. Furthermore, to keep the issue of its working methods on the agenda of the Security Council is, in and of itself, an accomplishment.

A New Phase in Security Council Reform Has Started
10 February, 2010
On February 5th, the Chair of the intergovernmental negotiations on Security Council reform, Ambassador Tanin of Afghanistan, sent out a letter to all member states with an attachment of sixty pages. The document (available here and here) includes all “substantive input” submitted by Member States to the Chair thus far in the fourth round of negotiations. This marks the beginning of the fifth round, which, for the first time, will be text-based.

Moving Towards Text-Based Negotiations?
By Jakob Silas Lund, 21 January 2010
The previous month was an eventful one in terms of the Security Council reform process. On December 23rd, a group of countries sent a letter to the Chair of the intergovernmental negotiations, Ambassador Tanin of Afghanistan, urging him to present a composite paper. Following that, Tanin received a number of other letters concerning the process and on January 14th he replied with his own letter to all member states. This all culminated in the latest round of negotiations on January 19th and 20th in which the consequences of the letter exchanges were discussed.

Pros and Cons of Security Council reform
By Jakob Silas Lund, 19 January 2010
Through extensive interviews with experts as well as current and former Ambassadors and diplomats who have been close to the reform process, this article outlines and analyzes the advantages and disadvantages of the components incorporated in the proposals currently on the table.

The Long and Winding Road
by Jakob Silas Lund, 11 December, 2009
On November 16th, the chair of the intergovernmental negotiations on Security Council reform, Ambassador Zahir Tanin of Afghanistan, sent a letter to all member states inviting them to the first meeting of the fourth round of negotiations. The negotiations ended up spanning over two days rather than the planned one-day session.