Home

The Creation of a Composite Gender Entity: System-wide Coherence reform 2008 to present.

By Katie Jagel
16 April 2012

The Creation of a Composite Gender Entity was one of the recommendations of the 2006 High-Level Panel on System-wide Coherence. This article maps the progress of the making of UN Women since 2008. The years 2005-early 2008 are covered in the previous article by Jonas von Freiesleben in Chapter 3 on System-wide Coherence in the Center’s 2008 Edition of Managing Change at the United Nations . This article starts in 2008 and covers the Member State disputes, concept notes and debates, and what the UN Women organization has been up to since its start date in February of 2011.

Introduction
       UN Women is a conglomerate organization that initiates, advocates, and raises funds for advancing equal rights policies for women. It aims to self-sufficiently coordinate its own programs, and it is an outgrowth of a recommendation to create an entity with a “stronger voice on women's issues” coming out of the 2006 High Level Panel on SWC. Informal meetings on the subject began in mid-2007 and continued through early 2008, but it would not be until mid-2010 that Member States created this united gender entity, which made it the first SWC cluster to come to a conclusion.

62nd Session: Inception and Preliminary Organization
       Co-Chairs, Ambassadors Augustine Mahiga of Tanzania and John Kavanagh of Ireland, headed the 2008 SWC initiative. They planned to head off some of the confusion that existed and uncover gaps in the existing gender architecture through pre-emptive informal meetings with Member States, UN agencies, and independent agencies specializing in gender reform and equality. The formal meetings then began on 16 May 2008 and developed a light blueprint for possible ways to meet structural needs. The plan proposed consolidating three pre-existing UN affiliated gender entities: the UN Division for the Advancements of Women (DAW), the Office of the Special Advisor on Gender Issues (OSAGI), and the UN Development Fund for Women (UNIFEM). This was met with initial resistance from the organizations affected. But, Gender Equality Architecture Reform (GEAR), an NGO involved in the informal meetings and follow up, was one of the main supporters of the merger. As a result of these meetings, Member States requested that Secretary-General (SG) Ban Ki Moon write a non-paper containing his recommendations and deliver it to the Assembly by 9 June 2008.
       Many organizations and Member States had reservations surrounding the possible creation of the integrated gender entity. Many including DAW, the United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF), the European Union (EU), and Switzerland worried there would be systematic, coherence, and coordination weaknesses. Others such as OSAGI, UNIFEM, and the CANZ Nations Nations (Canada, Australia, and New Zealand) worried that it was not the management of the resources but the issue of available authority that would govern relative successes or failures. In the end most States reiterated their support for the plan but said they would await the SG’s non-paper before taking further action, Kazakhstan being an exception to this, called to expedite the process.

      Ban's first concept note on the subject, with significant contribution from Deputy Under-Secretary Asha-Rose Migiro, was received by the General Assembly (GA) on 5 June 2008. The paper had four major sections including: coordination and coherence; authority and positioning; accountability; and resources. His Excellency cited the need for a stronger ground presence and strengthened channels for feedback. The report maintained that the responsibilities of widespread specialists and advisers do not substitute or make up for a designated leader. The report laments the lack of standards and inconsistent support that gender equality has faced in general and advocates the need to include either a measure of standards or the institution of consequences for inconsistencies and lack of accountability. It stressed that funding is inconsistent and unstable and needs to be addressed before a functioning entity could be put on the ground. The paper did not include specific architecture reforms, and so following an informal meeting on 16 June 2008, Member States requested another concept note specifically asking for the range of institutional options and/or institutional reforms to currently existing entities that the SG recommended as potential solutions.
       Prior to Member States issuing statements regarding the concept note, both the Co-Chairs and Deputy SG Migiro addressed Member States to reiterate the need for increased coordination between agencies and deepened coherence between normative top down decisions and actions taken on the ground. Member State responses to the first concept note fell into three major categories: those who wanted a new gender entity; those who wanted to reform current architecture; and those who awaited the second concept note before taking a position. The EU, stated that a new entity was necessary to institute proper reforms and address gaps in the current gender architecture, and that further, a high ranking official or director was needed to lead such an entity. stated that a new entity was necessary to institute proper reforms and address gaps in the current gender architecture, and that a high-ranking official or director was needed to lead such an entity. Liberia and Mozambique showed support for the new entity only, without specific comment as to the authority figure. Developing nations led other States against creating a new gender entity: they consistently said that the SWC was putting too much emphasis on gender issues which they conveyed as a developed or Western concern. There was also the fear that the gender issue was being 'de-linked' from the other needed SWC reforms and that those other issues would be left behind. The Joint Committee (JCC) of the Group of 77 (G771) and the Non-Aligned Movement (NAM) issued a statement stating that Member States were pursuing an unneeded entity and that a more analytic and reformist approach was needed to address the four major concerns of the concept note. China issued its own statement promoting the strengthening of existing mechanisms, indicating, “There is no evidence to show that a new entity will solve these problems.” India's statement also contained doubts as to the effectiveness of a new entity over the existing ones. CANZ, the Nordic Countries, Brazil, Egypt, Switzerland and others, all stipulated that they would wait for the next note by the SG before taking the next step in decision making.

      The co-Chairs, submitted a report on 21 July 2008 addressing the concerns of the JCC and others. They stated specifically that the gender issue was not becoming de-linked, and that the decision making process should proceed along with the other four SWC issues to end up with a single “packed decision” on all of the SWC clusters. The second concept note called the “Options Paper”, followed shortly thereafter from the Deputy SG on 23 July 2008. Both GEAR and OSAGI gave significant contributions for the creation of the paper. The Options Paper put fourth four different options: Option A was a 'Status Quo' control where no structural changes would be made to any current institutional framework. Option B was the 'Autonomous Fund/Programme option' which would combine four current gender-entities to form one autonomous program outside of the UN System, but receive some UN support. Option C, titled 'Department', proposed creating a new department within the UN, to be headed by an Under-Secretary-General (USG) as a part of the UN Secretariat. It would be responsible for creating a gender-specific angle that would be incorporated into UN peace support missions. The last Option, D, called the 'Composite Entity', would combine all normative and operational work under one single entity acting as a policy driver for all gender equality issues. A UN appointed USG would head the organization. The last option, the Composite Entity, appealed to the majority of Member States, who then asked the SG for a third note outlining details for a Composite Entity, with specificity given to how a new entity would be funded.

63rd Session: The Composite Entity
      A general mandate for such a 'Composite Entity' had already been created in the form of Resolution 62/227 in late 2007, but the SG’s third paper with specifics on the institutional details did not come out until 5 March 2009. Rachel Mayanja, appointed the SG's Special Adviser on Gender Issues in 2004, drafted the paper, entitled, “Options for Strengthening Institutional Arrangements on Gender Equality and the Empowerment of Women”. UN women's agencies, relevant non-governmental organizations, and Member States collaborated over a period of months to create the concept paper. The paper provided loose blueprints in the following four areas: governance, functions, staffing and funding options. Two informal meetings followed in March and April 2009, headed by the 2009 Co-Chairs of the SWC, Ambassadors Kaire Mbuende of Namibia and Juan Antonia Yáñez-Barnuevo of Spain, and attended by Member States and representatives from the UN system's gender entities at the time. The “Expert Group Meeting” on institutional architecture took place on 15 April 2009. In these meetings, Ms. Mayanja stressed that efficient funding structures, more so than just necessary amounts of funds, were contingent upon Member States. It was also stated that the new mandate should combine, and not duplicate entities to avoid overlap and waste. Thus, the document recommended streamlining resources and not dividing them amongst groups, rendering them less effective. Lastly, the document recommended that nation states themselves allot resources, enhancing UN ground presence.
       The vast majority of Member States were now in support of the Composite Option, but there was disagreement in regard to when action was required. The EU, the Nordic Group, CANZ, Ireland, and Mexico, wanted to act relatively quickly on the gender issue alone, taking a concrete step forward. Others, including the G77, NAM, China, Indian, and Japan, showed intense reservations on breaking with the integrated SWC process without first insuring results in the other cluster areas. Even though there was a consensus for the Composite Entity, the JCC and G77 said they would refuse to make decisions for a gender authority before the SG issued papers on Governance and Funding, which were of “greater interest”.

       The SG issued the papers on Governance and Funding in late April, and gender architecture discussions continued in June 2009 with new staffing information provided by the Secretariat. The paper recommended that the Composite Entity combine several pre-existing gender entities including OSAGI, DAW, and UNIFEM along with the International Research and Training Institute for the Advancement of Women (INSTRAW). They strongly suggested setting a deadline for the creation of the Composite Entity before the closing of the 63rd Session. The new entity would be expected to contribute to enhanced research capacities and act as an information hub for state actors, the UN, civil society groups, and women's groups. A majority of States, including the JCC, CANZ nations, the US, and Russia, said that more work was required on strengthening the architecture, and that research should continue even after the birth of the organization.

      The Composite Entity Option finally received its creating mandate from Resolution A/RES/63/311on the last day of the 63rd Session, 14 September 2009. The Resolution called for combining the existing entities OSAGI, DAW, UNIFEM and INSTRAW and their mandates, to be led by an USG appointed “in consultation with Member States, on the basis of equitable geographical representation and gender balance”, who would sit on the UN Chief Executives Board (CEB). At this point too much disagreement remained to form the actual organization immediately; consequently, Res. 311 requested the 64th GA create, “a comprehensive proposal specifying [...] the mission statement of the composite entity, the organizational arrangements, including an organizational chart, funding and the executive board to oversee its operational activities in order to commence intergovernmental negotiations.”

64th Session: Architecture and Modalities; Creation
       At an informal meeting hosted by UNIFEM in early October 2009, it was decided that 90% of staffing and funding should come from the UN organizations that combined to form the new entity, and that the new USG should come from outside the combined pre-existing organizations; “aware of the challenges and failures of the past but uninhibited or burdened by old allegiances”. It asked that the USG be appointed after funding was decided on by the UNESCO's budgetary committee, a goal set for March 2010.

       Discussions by Member States on institutional architecture for the proposed entity resumed in mid-February 2010 following a a concept note issued on 6 January 2010. The report loosely outlines a mission statement, organizational arrangements, provisions for funding, and options for an Executive Board to oversee operational activities, as well as an organizational chart showing a proposed structure. In an attempt to answer some of the governance questions, the report recommends that the entity be a subsidiary organ of the GA, with an USG who would report to the Economic and Social Council (ECOSOC), and with "an Executive Board [that] will oversee its operational activities”; it added specifically that the Commission on the Status of Women (CSW) “will play a crucial role in guiding its work.”

      Some states, led by the EU, pressed for accelerated action and an earlier appointment of a USG which could help in the transition process. Gambian and Russian delegations had reservations in regards to the universality of the entity and subsequent collaboration with the CSW. The JCC and the G77 called for more intense and detailed discussions on funding, organizational arrangements, and intergovernmental regulation as it pertained to the new entity.
       By mid-April to early May 2010 the GA was reviewing a draft proposal on the five SWC initiatives. Member States discussed six gender topics: the functions of the new entity; governance; funding architecture; consolidation of existing organizations and the transition period; the USG; and lastly, a name for the entity. Firstly, in the 'Functions' discussions, the JCC proposed that UNIFEM, as the largest existing body, should take on a leading role in operational and transition issues. Canada stated that the entity must be flexible, efficient, and effective with an 'on the ground' presence. The EU, Canada, Russia and Denmark all specified that the new organization must provide normative support to intergovernmental bodies, while carrying out operational actions productively. Second, under 'Governance', there was a divergence as to who should be the executive authority. Some groups like the JCC called for an Executive Board that would report to ESOCOC. Canada, Denmark and Switzerland argued that the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) should act as the governing authority. While most States brushed over 'Funding Architecture' the JCC made a statement that there needed to be further discussion, pressing for drawing up a comprehensive framework. Fourth, 'Consolidating Existing Organizations and Transition Period', was looked at by most groups and member states as key to the creation of the new entity. There would need to be open, clear and efficient information channels between the intergovernmental, normative level and the active ground-presence for coherent decision-making. Fifth, appointment of the USG was still an area of contention. The JCC maintained their position that the USG should be appointed after the creation of the entity, not before. The JCC's statement also recommended a 4-year term for the USG, held first by someone from a Southern nation, and then to follow a geographical rotation. In response, the EU, Canada, Denmark and Russia stated that the nomination of a USG was a key step in the actual creation of the entity and the appointment was needed for the transition. Lastly, there was disagreement in regard to the naming of the entity; with the JCC calling for Member States to name the entity and with states like Tanzania calling for the Secretary General to name the entity.

65th Session: Settling In
       Although Member States seemed very far away from it at their meetings, the GA finally created UN Women “The United Nations Entity for Gender Equality and Empowerment of Women” in July 2010 within Resolution A/RES/64/289. This put a conclusion to treating SWC issues as an integrated unit. Michelle Bachelet was appointed the new USG for UN Women in September of 2010. UN Women became a functioning entity in early February of 2011.The three main roles of UN Women, as stipulated on their website are first, “to support inter-governmental bodies, such as the CSW, in their formulation of policies, global standards and norms”, second, “to help Member States to implement these standards, standing ready to provide suitable technical and financial support to those countries that request it, and to forge effective partnerships with civil society” and lastly, “to hold the UN system accountable for its own commitments on gender equality, including regular monitoring of system-wide progress.” The Resolution also provided for a multi-tiered intergovernmental governance structure: “the General Assembly, the Economic and Social Council and the Commission on the Status of Women shall constitute the multi-tiered intergovernmental governance structure for the normative support functions and shall provide normative policy guidance to the Entity.”

66th Session: The 56th Commission
       The one-year anniversary of UN Women was celebrated on 2 February 2012. Just one day earlier, on 1 February 2012 it was announced that UN Women, UNDP, and the EU, would partner in the first joint program piloting a model for EU/UN collaboration on Women, Peace and Security.
      UN Women hosted the 56th CSW in February and March of 2012. The main themes were; empowerment of rural women and their role in poverty and hunger eradication; development and current challenges; and financing for gender equality and the empowerment of women. The Commission was largely successful with at least seven draft resolutions adopted by the GA coming out of the two-week event. Although both these ventures have been successful the organization is struggling with fundraising issues.


  1. Current number of member countries is 132
AttachmentSize
SWC_SwitzerlandStatementGender_16May08.pdf77.02 KB
SWC_EUStatementGender_16May08.pdf690.99 KB
SWC_UnicefStatementGender_16May08.pdf68.68 KB
SWC_CanadaStatementGender_16May08.pdf723.64 KB
SWC_KazakhstanStatementGender_16May08.pdf96.68 KB
SWC_GenderEUStatement_16Jun08.pdf1.04 MB
EU_SWCStatement_13Mar09.pdf49.64 KB
Ireland_SWCStatement_13Mar09.pdf97.01 KB
UK_StatementOnSWC_13Mar09.pdf103.83 KB
G77-statement.pdf94.05 KB
A-64-588 Report of the SG Jan 2010.pdf128.39 KB
Spain-EU_SWCStatement_4Feb10.pdf309.07 KB
Russian Statement.pdf93.07 KB
JCC_SWCStatmt_4Feb10.pdf198.37 KB
» printer friendly version

Latest Updates

21 Member States Launch ACT, a New Initiative for Better Working Methods of the UN Security Council
by William Pace, 12 May 2013
On Thursday, 2 May 2013, ACT (Accountability, Coherence, and Transparency) officially launched its initiative for better working methods of the Security Council. This initiative is a follow up to the multi-year efforts from the S5, in particular in regard to its draft resolution L.42 Rev.2 from May 2012.

Chapter 1b on Security Council Reform: September 2007-May 2013
7 May 2013
The Center is updating its 2008 publication on "Managing Change at the UN." Chapter 1b has now been made available online. The publication is intended to serve as a resource for academics, media, NGOs, and newly arrived diplomats.

No Strong Support for Drafting of Concise Working Document: Chair Proposes to Put Negotiations on "Strategic Hold."
Updated 7 May 2013
On 16 and 17 April 2013, Member States discussed ways on how to proceed with the intergovernmental negotiations on Security Council reform, reacting to the proposals made by the Chair in July 2012. The Chair of the negotiations, Amb.Zahir Tanin of Afghanistan, believes that without a working document that could lead to actual give-and-take negotiations, it might be better to "put the negotiations on strategic hold."

Draft Resolutions on Security Council Reform: Growing Convergence between Developing Countries?
By Lydia Swart, 4 March 2013
Includes draft resolutions from L69 (2012) and CARICOM (2013)

Update on Security Council Reform: Another impasse?
By Lydia Swart, 1 February 2013
An update on Security Council reform efforts from July 2012 - 30 January 2013

Annual debate on the working methods of the Security Council - DPI report
26 November 2012

Joint Debate in the General Assembly on the Report of the Security Council & the Question of equitable representation and increase in its membership - DPI report
15 November 2012

67th Session Third Committee Preview
By Tamara Johnson, 24 October 2012
As the Third Committee progresses with its 67th session, here are some hot button issues with which the NGO community and some delegations (the off the record nature of the consultations informing this article prevents specifics) are particularly concerned.

Report on the Security Council Open Debate on Children in Armed Conflict
By Tamara Johnson, 28 September 2012
The Security Council, on 19 September 2012, held an open debate pertaining to The Report of the Secretary-General A/66/782-S/2012/26 on the status of children in armed conflicts and Resolution 2068(2012), the Security Council’s response to the Secretary-General’s report. While this subject of protecting children seems noncontroversial, the resolution proved more polemical than one may have expected. The principle subject under dispute was the reach of the Security Council’s mandate to protect children in armed conflict. The modalities of such protection and the efficacy or appropriateness of different options were also discussed. This report outlines key aspects of the resolution and the lines of argument the debate followed.

Report on Rio+20 Outcome and Migration: Including all stakeholders in the future we want
By Tamara Johnson, 30 August 2012
On 22 August 2012, the United Nations Institute for Training and Research (UNITAR), the United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA), the International Organization for Migration (IOM), and the MacArthur Foundation hosted a seminar to review issues surrounding migration policy in a human rights-based framework, as outlined in the Rio+20 outcome document, "The Future We Want.” This report summarizes the statements made at the event.

Report on the Committee for Development Policy Strategy Beyond 2015
By Tamara Johnson, 10 August 2012
On 23 July 2012, the Economic and Social Council (ECOSOC) heard a briefing by members of the Committee for Development Policy (CDP) regarding development strategy post-2015. The Vice-President of the Council, H.E. Mr. Luis Alfonso de Alba, opened the meeting. CDP members Ms. Sakiko Fukuda-Parr, Professor of International Affairs, The New School; and Mr. Norman Girvan, Professional Research Fellow, UWI Graduate Institute of International Relations, University of the West Indies, Trinidad and Tobago reviewed the Committee’s recent report, United Nations Development Strategy Beyond 2015. This article provides a summary of the briefing and the CDP report.

Report on ECOSOC Panel Discussion: "Improving capacities for evidence-based humanitarian decision-making”
By Tamara Johnson, 5 August 2012
On 19 July 2012, the Economic and Social Council (ECOSOC) held a panel discussion, “Improving capacities for evidence-based humanitarian decision-making,” as part of its humanitarian affairs segment on special economic, humanitarian and disaster relief assistance. This report provides a summary of the meeting.

Letter of the Chair of the Intergovernmental Negotiations on SC Reform outlines negotiations thus far and possible ways to move the process along
By Lydia Swart
On 25 July 2012, Amb. Zahir Tanin, in his capacity as Chair of the Intergovernmental Negotiations on Security Council reform, wrote a letter to the President of the General Assembly, H.E. Mr. Nassir Abdulaziz Al-Nasser, in which he provided an overview of the intergovernmental negotiations to date while also outlining possible ways to move the process along, including a concise working document to be drafted by the Chair. It is noteworthy that in spite of this bold move, Amb. Tanin was reappointed by the President of the General Assembly of the 67th Session as Chair of the negotiations.

Report on the Security Council Open Debate on the Peacebuilding Commission
By Tamara Johnson, 20 July 2012
On 12 July 2012, The Security Council (SC) met with representatives of the World Bank and the Chair and former Chair of the Peacebuilding Commission (PBC) to debate the PBC’s efficacy and relevance. SC President and Minister for Foreign Affairs of Colombia, Her Excellency María Angela Holguín, convened the debate pursuant to the Report of the Peacebuilding Commission on its fifth session (S/2012/70) and a Note Verbale dated 2 July 2012 from the Permanent Mission of Colombia to the United Nations addressed to the Secretary-General (S/2012/511). This report provides a summary of the meeting.

Report on ECOSOC Panel Discussion: “Mobilizing partnerships for development, including in the field of education.”
By Tamara Johnson, 22 July 2012
On 11 July 2012, the Economic and Social Council (ECOSOC) held a panel discussion, “Mobilizing partnerships for development, including in the field of education.” Vice-President of the Council, H.E. Mr. Mootaz Ahmadein Khalil (Egypt) chaired the panel, which was moderated by Ms. Sigrid Kaag, Assistant Secretary-General and Assistant Administrator and Director of the Bureau of External Relations and Advocacy, United Nations Development Programme. This report provides a summary of the meeting.

Report of the 4th Thematic Meeting in the Ad Hoc Working Group on Revitalization of the work of the General Assembly
By Mie Hansen,28 June 2012
On 1 June 2012, the Ad Hoc Working Group (AHWG) on Revitalization of the work of the General Assembly met for the fourth and final thematic meeting, dedicated to a discussion of “ Enhancing the functions of the Office of the President of the General Assembly including Strengthening its institutional memory and its relationship with the Secretariat”. This report provides a summary of the meeting.

Report on the 2nd and 3rd Thematic Meeting in the Ad Hoc Working Group on Revitalization of the work of the General Assembly
By Mie Hansen,17 May 2012
On 30 April 2012 and 10 May 2012 the Ad Hoc Working Group (AHWG) on the revitalization of the work of the General Assembly held its 2nd and 3rd thematic meetings, discussing respectively “Working methods of the General Assembly, implementation of GA resolutions and the agenda, as well as operational and technical issues” and “The role of the General Assembly in the selection and appointment of the Secretary-General of the UN, as well as in the selection of candidatures for other executive Heads of the UN system”. This report provides a summary of the two meetings

Report on Security Council Reform Meeting 10 April 2012
By Kirsten Schlosser
4 May 2012
On 10 April 2012 the fifth meeting of the eighth round of Intergovernmental Negotiations was held on Security Council reform. This meeting was devoted to the reform initiative of the C-10, presented by the Member State Sierra Leone. This summary is based on statements given by Member States at the meeting.

Report on Security Council Reform Meeting 13 March 2012
By Kirsten Schlosser
4 May 2012
On 13 March 2012 the fourth meeting of the eighth round of Intergovernmental Negotiations was held on Security Council reform. This meeting was devoted to the reform initiative of the L.69 Group, presented by the Member State Jamaica. This summary is based on statements given by Member States at the meeting.

Report on the first thematic meeting of the Ad Hoc Working Group on Revitalization of the work of the General Assembly
By Mie Hansen, 25 April 2012
Last Thursday, 19 April 2012, the ad hoc working group on the revitalization of the work of the General Assembly met for the first thematic meeting of the session, dedicated to “The role and authority of the General Assembly and its relationship to the principal organs of the United Nations and other groups outside the United Nations”

Harmonization of Business Practices: System-wide Coherence reform 2008 to Present
By Katie Jagel 23 April 2012
Harmonization of business practices was first introduced to the UN in 1977 within resolution 32/197 which resolved, “…measures should be taken to achieve maximum uniformity of administrative, financial, budgetary, personnel and planning procedures, including the establishment of [...] harmonized budget and programme cycles”. The idea made its resurgence as one of the five surviving clusters of the 2006 High Panel on system-wide coherence (SWC). In a 2009 outcome document from a joint meeting between the executive heads of UNDP, UNFPA, UNICEF, and WFP, it stipulates, “While simplification and harmonization of business practices in the UN system are not new initiatives, the urgency and momentum, the scope, and the approach are now new aspects of those initiatives.” ECOSOC has subsumed the initiative to a large degree, often with collaboration from the CEB, UNDG, and WFP, with progress shifting away from 'harmonization' and towards 'simplification' starting in 2010.

Improving the Funding System of Operational Activities for Development: System-wide Coherence 2008 to Present
By Katie Jagel 23 April 2012
Funding reform has been, and continues to be, a necessary reform to enhance UN efficiency. This article covers the progress of Funding as a cluster within system-wide coherence in 2008, to the present efforts of improving the funding system of operational activities for development taken on by the Fifth Committee, ECOSOC, UNESDA, and the CEB.

Strengthening Governance of Operational Activities for Development: System-wide Coherence 2008 to Present
By Katie Jagel 18 April 2012
Governance reform within the UN is one of the most active sites for comprehensive UN reform. Since 2006, simple ‘governance’ reform has transformed into the more formal “Strengthening Governance of Operational Activities for Development” and has been a fixture on several UN organ agendas. This article maps the efforts, debates, outcome documents, resolutions, since 2008 but focuses mainly, on the actual progress made by the UN on the governance front.

The “Delivering as One" (DaO) Initiative: System-wide Coherence reform.
By Katie Jagel 18 April 2012
This article is a summary of the Delivering as One initiative, monitoring the events which took place from inception up through implementation and subsequent evaluations. It tracks the events and debates which took place since 2008 up through the latest Quadrennial Comprehensive Policy Review planning documents, planned for late spring of 2012.

The Creation of a Composite Gender Entity: System-wide Coherence reform 2008-present.
By Katie Jagel 16 April 2012
The Creation of a Composite Gender Entity was one of the recommendations of the 2006 High-Level of System-wide Coherence. This article maps the progress of the making of UN Women since 2008. The years 2005-early 2008 are covered in the previous article by Jonas von Freiesleben in Chapter 3 on System-wide Coherence in the Center’s 2008 Edition of Managing Change at the United Nations . This article starts in 2008 and covers the Member State disputes, many concept notes and debates, and what the UN Women organization has been up to since its start date in February of 2011.

The S5 presents draft resolution on the Improvement the Working Methods of the Security Council
By Mie Hansen 10 April 2012
On 4 April 2012 the S5 (Jordan, Liechtenstein, Costa Rica, Singapore and Switzerland) presented a draft resolution on improving the working methods of the Security Council. At the meeting the S5 called for the General Assembly to take a stand to on the issue and suggested 16 May as a possible date for a vote. This article provides a summary of the proposal and the meeting held on it.

First Meeting of the 66th GA session in the Ad Hoc Working Group on Revitalization of the Work of the General Assembly
By Mie Hansen 30 March 2012
On 27 March 2012 the ad hoc working group on revitalization of the work of the General Assembly held its first meeting of the 66th General Assembly session. The working group, established pursuant to resolution 65/315, is during the current session Co-Chaired by Ambassador Alexander Lomaia of Georgia and Ambassador Susan Waffa-Ogoo of the Gambia. The meeting was dedicated to a general exchange of views among the Member States on all of the issues included in the revitalization of the work of the General Assembly. This article provides a summary of the meeting and the statements made.

Report on Economic and Social Council (ECOSOC) March 7th Special Panel Discussion on “ECOSOC and Global Governance”
By Katie Jagel, 21 March 2012
On March 7th ECOSOC hosted a Special Panel Discussion in New York centered around Global governance. The Discussion hosted three distinguished panelists and was designed by the President of ECOSOC, H.E. Miloš Koterec, as an 'open free-flowing discussion with no formal statements' between Member States and the panelists. Based on questions and statements from Member States, ECOSOC's role in global governance within the UN system is unquestioned but needs to be better defined and articulated in order for it to utilize its mandate as a 'logical platform and good compliment alongside the G20 and the Bretton Woods Institutions (BWI's)'.

Report on Security Council Reform Meeting 21 February 2011
By Mie Hansen, 12 March 2012
On 21 February 2012 the third meeting in the eighth round of the intergovernmental negotiations on Security Council reform was held, dedicated to the reform initiative of the Uniting for Consensus group. Based on statements delivered by Member States at the meeting as well as conversations with delegates and observers to the process, this report provides a summary of the meeting as well as an update on the current state of the negotiations.

The Human Rights Council: Is it filling its mission as the World’s premier human rights protector?
By Thomas Colerick 23 February 2012
This posting provides an update of the Center’s 2008 article “The establishment of the Humans Rights Council”. It analyzes the achievements of as well as challenges to the Council since 2008 as seen from the perspectives of different stakeholder including civil society, UN Officials and UN Member States.

Update on Security Council Reform: Meeting from 26 January 2012
By Alicia Stott, 15 Febraury 2012
In a letter by the current chair of the Intergovernmental Negotiations to the Member States and the President of the General Assembly, it was stated that in the interest of facilitating more in-depth discussion and evaluation the remainder of the meetings for the eighth round of the group will be providing each of the representatives of the five major initiatives the opportunity to present their most current proposals for Security Council reform, beginning with the G-4.

The Council on Foreign Relations posts video talk on Security Council Reform
On 11 January 2012 the Council on Foreign Relations posted a video talk by Stewart M. Patrick on Security Council Reform, entitled “UN Security Council Reform: Is it Time?”. Click here to watch the video talk on the CFR website

Meeting on General Assembly Revitalization 1 December 2011
By Mie Hansen, 5 January 2012
On 1 December 2011 the General Assembly met to discuss Agenda Item 120: Implementation of the Resolutions of the United Nations and Agenda Item 121: Revitalization of the Work of the General Assembly.
This article provides an overview of the debate.

Former consultant with the Center for UN Reform Education wins prestigious award
By Thomas Colerick, 13 December 2011

Meeting in the General Assembly on Security Council Reform, 8 and 9 November 2011
By Mie Hansen, 7 December 2011
On 8 and 9 November 2011 the 51st and 52nd plenary meetings of the 66th General Assembly session were held with a discussion of Agenda Item 122: Question of equitable representation on and increase in the membership of the Security Council and related matters. This article gives an overview of the debate and the statements made during the meetings, as well as an update on the developments in regard to Security Council reform leading up to the debate.

The 2011 Annual Report of the Human Rights Council
By Thomas Colerick, 8 November 2011
The 2011 Annual Report of the Council is now available.

Highlights of the Human Rights Council’s 18th Regular session
By Thomas Colerick, 11 October 2011

New report on the Human Rights Council’s fifth year
By Thomas Colerick, 4 October 2011

The Human Rights Council’s 18th Session (12-30 September 2011)
By Thomas Colerick, 28 September 2011

Update on Revitalization of the General Assembly: A RECAP OF DEVELOPMENTS DURING THE 65th GA SESSION
By Mie Hansen, 27 September 2011
Even before heads of state from around the world gathered last week at UN headquarters in New York for the opening of the 66th annual session of the UN General Assembly, the world’s main deliberative body, continuation of the ongoing negotiations to make the Assembly more effective, efficient and relevant were assured for yet another year. Member States have been discussing the “Revitalization of the General Assembly” for the past twenty years, but according to some critics only minor improvements have been made, leaving deep-seated reforms untouched. Even though all Member States seem to agree that reform of the Assembly is vital, recent developments confirm that it is still very difficult to reach an agreement on what should be done.

Chronology: The Human Rights Council – elections, sessions and important developments
By Thomas Colerick, 23 September 2011
As the Center for UN Reform Education once again will be covering the Human Rights Council more systematically, this chronology of the Council is provided. It includes elections, selected sessions and major developments and takes the reader from the Council’s birth in 2006 to today where the Council is currently holding its 18th Session in Geneva, Switzerland.




Panel on Improving Security Council Working Methods
On 23 June 2011, The Center for UN Reform Education held a panel discussion on “Improving the Working Methods of the Security Council”. The basis for the discussion was the most recent version of the S5 draft proposal on Reforming the Working Methods of the Security Council.




Qatar hosts workshop on Security Council Reform
On 12 & 13 May 2011, Qatar hosted a workshop on Security Council Reform in Doha. Lydia Swart of the Center was invited and she shared ten observations on this key reform process.

To move the process along, Member States, the Chair of the Intergovernmental Negotiations, and/or the President of the General Assembly will need to provide leadership by proposing a timeline/trajectory for the negotiations and by formulating a compromise solution that can garner support from all factions.




S5 presents draft resolution on Improving the Working Methods of the Security Council
By Mie Hansen, 2 May 2011
On 14 April, 2011, the Small Five Group (S5), consisting of Costa Rica, Jordan, Liechtenstein, Singapore and Switzerland, presented a draft resolution for Improving the Working Methods of the Security Council. The resolution was presented under agenda item 115 of the General Assembly (GA) that deals with follow-up to the outcome of the Millennium Summit. The S5 had presented its first draft resolution on the topic (A/60/L.49) in 2006 also as follow-up to the 2000/2005 Summits.

Update on Security Council Reform
By Mie Hansen, 5 April 2011
Since the Center’s latest update of 22 June 2010, Members States conducted text-based negotiations on 21 October 2010, 11 November 2010, 14 December 2010, and on 2 March 2011 in their efforts to reform the Security Council. Some countries apparently continue to slow down the negotiations, while others may push for a vote sooner rather than later.

Book Launch, The Group of 77: Perspectives on its Role in the UN General Assembly.
25 April 2011
Pictured from right to left: Center President William R. Pace, Minister Marcelo Suarez Salvia from Argentina (current G77 Chair), Ambassador Maged Abdelaziz of Egypt, Ambassador Herman Schaper of the Netherlands, and co-author Lydia Swart. For their remarks, click here: Minister Suarez, Ambassador Schaper, Ambassador Abdelaziz (pending) and Lydia Swart.





Text-based Negotiations in Full Swing
22 June 2010
On June 16th the negotiations on Security Council reform proceeded with the third meeting of the fifth round. The meeting aimed at getting member states to discuss specific language on the fourth “key issue”. Many countries seemed to have misunderstood the intention of the Chair, however, and restated their positions rather than making suggestions for specific changes to the document at hand.

Potentially Historic Text on Security Council Reform
By Jakob Lund, 13 May 2010
On May 10th, Zahir Tanin, the Chair of the intergovernmental negotiations on the question of equitable representation and increase in the membership of the Security Council and other matters related to the Security Council, sent out a long-awaited fax to all member states containing a “negotiation text”. The text and the annex can be accessed on the website of the PGA. The text includes the proposals sent by member states to Tanin's office since he opened the process of moving towards a text-based solution.

Open Debate on the Working Methods of the Security Council
By Jakob Silas Lund, 28 April 2010
On April 22nd, the Security Council’s Informal Working Group on Documentation and Other Procedural Issues held an open debate on the working methods of the Council. The debate raised some key questions that are relevant to the ongoing Security Council reform negotiations. Furthermore, to keep the issue of its working methods on the agenda of the Security Council is, in and of itself, an accomplishment.

A New Phase in Security Council Reform Has Started
10 February, 2010
On February 5th, the Chair of the intergovernmental negotiations on Security Council reform, Ambassador Tanin of Afghanistan, sent out a letter to all member states with an attachment of sixty pages. The document (available here and here) includes all “substantive input” submitted by Member States to the Chair thus far in the fourth round of negotiations. This marks the beginning of the fifth round, which, for the first time, will be text-based.

Moving Towards Text-Based Negotiations?
By Jakob Silas Lund, 21 January 2010
The previous month was an eventful one in terms of the Security Council reform process. On December 23rd, a group of countries sent a letter to the Chair of the intergovernmental negotiations, Ambassador Tanin of Afghanistan, urging him to present a composite paper. Following that, Tanin received a number of other letters concerning the process and on January 14th he replied with his own letter to all member states. This all culminated in the latest round of negotiations on January 19th and 20th in which the consequences of the letter exchanges were discussed.

Pros and Cons of Security Council reform
By Jakob Silas Lund, 19 January 2010
Through extensive interviews with experts as well as current and former Ambassadors and diplomats who have been close to the reform process, this article outlines and analyzes the advantages and disadvantages of the components incorporated in the proposals currently on the table.

The Long and Winding Road
by Jakob Silas Lund, 11 December, 2009
On November 16th, the chair of the intergovernmental negotiations on Security Council reform, Ambassador Zahir Tanin of Afghanistan, sent a letter to all member states inviting them to the first meeting of the fourth round of negotiations. The negotiations ended up spanning over two days rather than the planned one-day session.