Can the Iron Lady from the Baltics Save the United Nations?

By Ayca Ariyoruk
12 April 2006

Based on power measurements such as visibility and economic impact, Forbes magazine named Vaira Vike-Freiberga one of the 100 most powerful women in the world, a tribute she shares with the U.S. Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice and Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton of New York. Previously as an academic and community leader and more recently as the Latvian president, Mrs. Vike-Freiberga helped resuscitate and rebuild the small Baltic nation of 2.3 million, which had been completely absorbed into the communist Soviet empire and had disappeared from the world map for half a century.
Vaira Vike-FreibergaVaira Vike-Freiberga
Although Vike-Freiberga has not announced her candidacy for the top U.N. job, some observers speculate she is what the U.N. needs. An inspirational leader, Vike-Freiberga offered hope to Latvians at times of desperation and demonstrated moral courage to do the right thing despite the consequences. We met on March 8, 2006 at her modest presidential suite in a mid-town hotel in New York. Minutes before our rendezvous, she had met with Secretary General Kofi Annan, to whom she served as a special envoy, promoting Mr. Annan’s agenda on reform in the period leading up to the World Summit in September 2005.

The question of “What did you tell Mr. Annan?” naturally opens up our conversation. Referring to Mr. Annan’s recent report on management reforms, she responds that she has “ congratulated him on his proposal to streamline the procedures, re-evaluate the programs, and upgrade staff qualifications at the U.N. – in other words, on investing in organizational, infrastructure, and human resources”. She adds: “I wish the secretary general well in pushing it through both the budget committee and the General Assembly, which by the way will not happen for a few months, but will be spread over a period of five years.” Vike-Freiberga expresses a belief that not everybody will be thrilled with the proposed changes. However, in her opinion “the painful choices are best taken quickly”. “When you are docking a dog’s tail, it is better to dock it in one cut as not to prolong the process. It will hurt for a while then it’s going to heal, and you will have a handsome dog, or a new country, or a new organization. It helps to lessen the pain if you do it quickly.”

A Painful Personal Journey
At present, Vike-Freiberga (69), resides at a 14 th century castle in the Latvian capital of Riga, but as a child she had to endure the horrendous living conditions of refugee camps. Her family fled Riga in 1944, three days before the Red Army invaded the city. The following winter marked a turning point in her life as she witnessed the death of her baby sister in a German refugee camp. “ As a child I wanted to help humanity. I wanted to do something, because nothing could be done for my little sister and all these others who were dying around her. We had no aspirin, absolutely nothing to help the sick; it was survival of the fittest in the grossest, most brutal way.” After brief schooling in refugee camps in Germany and French Morocco, in 1953 she and her family settled in Canada. She was accepted to medical school but chose to study collective psychology instead, which would enable her to resolve group conflicts much like the ones that caused the suffering she witnessed as a child. Vike-Freiberga embarked on a distinguished academic career becoming a professor of collective psychology at McGill University in Montreal and specializing in the relationship between memory, thought, and language. According to her, “Psychology is not about bourgeois individualism and it’s not just psychoanalysis. Collective processes have a psychological aspect and nowhere is it more apparent than in politics, because politics is all about group psychology and mass processes.”

Guarding and Re-building Latvia
Determined to conserve Latvian identity, Vike-Freiberga devoted herself to the preservation of Latvian cultural heritage. In the process, she scanned thousands of Latvian folk songs into a computer database and wrote widely on Latvian folklore and language. She traveled the world to speak to Latvians scattered around the globe and nourished their dream of returning home to a free, independent, and democratic Latvia. Latvia suffered immensely under Soviet rule, during which thousands were either executed or forced to work in Siberian labour camps.

After the failed Soviet coup against Mikhail Gorbachev in 1991, Latvia along with the two other Baltic nations, Lithuania and Estonia, saw an opportunity to break free and declared independence. Seven years later, Vike-Freiberga returned to Latvia to head the Latvian Institute charged with raising the nation’s profile and within a year was elected president by the 100-membered Latvian Parliament. She is the first woman to hold such a position in an Eastern or Central European state.

As president, she dove right into the real business of rebuilding the country and led Latvia through a series of political, economic, and military reforms, which gained the country’s membership in the two most desired western clubs, the European Union and NATO. Commenting on the changing role of NATO, she jokes that the alliance’s intervention will not be necessary during Latvia’s hockey games. Apart from its ‘stabilizing role’ in Afghanistan, NATO patrolled the Olympics in Italy last month and has been asked to monitor the soccer World Cup this summer in Germany, said Vike-Freiberga, when she addressed a think-tank audience in Washington D.C. President Vike-Freiberga will host the next NATO summit in Riga in November, in which the participants will asses an option to expand NATO’s role in addressing the crises in Sudan’s Darfur region.

During the first term of her presidency, Vike-Freiberga continued to utilize her passion for Latvia for the revitalization of Latvian identity. She vetoed a bill that would have turned Russian into Latvia's second official language, and also defended a new legislation, which now requires post-war immigrants to pass a language exam in order to acquire Latvian citizenship. Under Soviet occupation, Russians were flooded into the republic under a deliberate policy of Russification, squeezing the Latvian language out of official use.

Her straightforwardness and bold stamina gained her the reputation of the Iron Lady of the Baltics and made her an instant celebrity around the world. There is already a website, which, features news about Vike-Freiberga, follows her official appearances and collects quotes from her speeches. One popular instance presented itself when President George W. Bush and 57 other heads of states, attended a parade in Moscow to commemorate the 60th anniversary of the end of World War II. President Vike-Freiberga took the opportunity to publicly demand an apology from Russia for Stalin’s crimes. She has also been a supporter of the U.S. led war in Iraq, because she finds the idea of “uncontained dictatorship a very painful one.” Fluent in English, French, German, Spanish, and Latvian, she can manage Portuguese and Italian and started learning Russian as a gesture to the Russian minority in Latvia. She was re-elected in 2003 for a second four-year term as president. Her term will end in June 2007.

Do You Want Russia to Be Like Germany and Apologize?
Considering how much Vike-Freiberga irked the Russians with her daring rhetoric, one is curious whether she will bend her language to win the hearts of Moscow for the secretary general selection. Russia’s support is crucial given its power to potentially veto any decision that would make the Latvian president the next secretary general. “There are positive signs” says Vike-Freiberga, “Mr. Putin has already denounced the crimes committed in earlier times in the Czech Republic and in Hungary. We have not heard similar expressions from the current leadership of Russia about the Baltic countries, which I think would be welcomed.” She adds that “Latvia would be quite content with seeing the Russian Federation of today simply distance itself from the crimes of the Soviet Union… the Russian Federation is the heir of the Soviet Union but it is not identical with it. Having lost the war, Germany paid compensation, but the Soviet Union was part of the winning coalition so crimes continued for many decades.”

How to Strengthen the Office of the Secretary General?
Our conversation moves to the reform of the secretary general selection process. There she has a different take from other policy makers and experts who have been advocating a more open process. “ It’s difficult to reform a process that has not really been formalized to any great extent. It’s not the kind of job where you can submit your CV and apply. If they did that, it would, severely restrict the candidates to those who would only go for an open candidacy. The idea of it being very discreet and behind the scenes is very much like the search for top level executives for large multinationals or large corporations. It is usually done very discreetly so as not to embarrass potential candidates who would want to be considered or whom the organization would want to consider without causing embarrassment to others who are not selected. While she believes “transparency and some kind of coherence in the process are important”, she wouldn’t want to see it turn into a ‘circus’. “I would hate to see the selection of the secretary general being the sort of a process where candidates run around the world looking for financial supporters, where financial supporters affect the selection process and where votes are bought. It opens up a rather horrifying prospect.”

She also thinks the secretary general should have more authority over decisions in hiring and firing in the Secretariat. “You can’t expect somebody to be accountable and to produce results without having authority over those who work under that person. It’s an elementary principal of management that managers in a hierarchy assume proportional responsibility, but that responsibility has to be accompanied by authority.”

Geographical Discrimination at the UN?
Will the U.N. Security Council give her candidacy a serious consideration? That all depends on China. Earlier this year, China declared it was Asia’s turn to have a secretary general and Russia gladly endorsed it. The contenders who have announced intensions with advance endorsements from their governments are all from Asia. They are namely Jayantha Dhanapala of Sri Lanka [view U.N.ReformWatch No. 7], Surakiart Sathirathai of Thailand [view U.N.ReformWatch no. 9], and Ban Ki-Moon of South Korea.

With the habit of attacking the wisdom of conventions at the United Nations, U.S. Ambassador John Bolton stated that the United States does not recognize the tradition of geographic rotations. If there was one, Bolton said at a press conference early this year, it would be Eastern Europe’s turn, not Asia’s, because Eastern Europe has never had a single secretary general. Vike-Freiberga doesn’t see any point in regional rotation either, as “it has not been consistently applied in the past…It’s not enshrined anywhere in the founding documents of the organization and has been at some point accepted as a way of going about it in a practical way.”

Time for a Woman?
There has also never been a woman secretary general and only about 16 percent of the high ranking jobs at the United Nations are occupied by females. Equality Now, an international women's rights group has compiled a list of 18 women it believes should be considered as a possible successor to the United Nations secretary general, among the names are Vike-Freiberga, along with the New Zealand’s Prime Minister Helen Clark, and Colombia Foreign Minister Caroline Barco Isakson. Vike-Freiberga believes that it is high time for a woman to lead the United Nations: “sixty years gone by since the founding of the United Nations and I haven’t even heard of a serious candidate being mentioned for secretary general in previous years”. Ultimately, however, Vike-Freiberga says when choosing the next secretary general the primary concern should be qualities the candidates will bring to the United Nations.

Ayca Ariyoruk is a research fellow at the Center. The Center does not endorse any particular candidate, but works to promote a public element to the selection of the Secretary-General.


Latest Updates

The Council on Foreign Relations posts video talk on Security Council Reform
On 11 January 2012 the Council on Foreign Relations posted a video talk by Stewart M. Patrick on Security Council Reform, entitled “UN Security Council Reform: Is it Time?”. Click here to watch the video talk on the CFR website

Meeting on General Assembly Revitalization 1 December 2011
By Mie Hansen, 5 January 2012
On 1 December 2011 the General Assembly met to discuss Agenda Item 120: Implementation of the Resolutions of the United Nations and Agenda Item 121: Revitalization of the Work of the General Assembly.
This article provides an overview of the debate.

Former consultant with the Center for UN Reform Education wins prestigious award
By Thomas Colerick, 13 December 2011

Meeting in the General Assembly on Security Council Reform, 8 and 9 November 2011
By Mie Hansen, 7 December 2011
On 8 and 9 November 2011 the 51st and 52nd plenary meetings of the 66th General Assembly session were held with a discussion of Agenda Item 122: Question of equitable representation on and increase in the membership of the Security Council and related matters. This article gives an overview of the debate and the statements made during the meetings, as well as an update on the developments in regard to Security Council reform leading up to the debate.

The 2011 Annual Report of the Human Rights Council
By Thomas Colerick, 8 November 2011
The 2011 Annual Report of the Council is now available.

Highlights of the Human Rights Council’s 18th Regular session
By Thomas Colerick, 11 October 2011

New report on the Human Rights Council’s fifth year
By Thomas Colerick, 4 October 2011

The Human Rights Council’s 18th Session (12-30 September 2011)
By Thomas Colerick, 28 September 2011

Update on Revitalization of the General Assembly: A RECAP OF DEVELOPMENTS DURING THE 65th GA SESSION
By Mie Hansen, 27 September 2011
Even before heads of state from around the world gathered last week at UN headquarters in New York for the opening of the 66th annual session of the UN General Assembly, the world’s main deliberative body, continuation of the ongoing negotiations to make the Assembly more effective, efficient and relevant were assured for yet another year. Member States have been discussing the “Revitalization of the General Assembly” for the past twenty years, but according to some critics only minor improvements have been made, leaving deep-seated reforms untouched. Even though all Member States seem to agree that reform of the Assembly is vital, recent developments confirm that it is still very difficult to reach an agreement on what should be done.

Chronology: The Human Rights Council – elections, sessions and important developments
By Thomas Colerick, 23 September 2011
As the Center for UN Reform Education once again will be covering the Human Rights Council more systematically, this chronology of the Council is provided. It includes elections, selected sessions and major developments and takes the reader from the Council’s birth in 2006 to today where the Council is currently holding its 18th Session in Geneva, Switzerland.



Panel on Improving Security Council Working Methods
On 23 June 2011, The Center for UN Reform Education held a panel discussion on “Improving the Working Methods of the Security Council”. The basis for the discussion was the most recent version of the S5 draft proposal on Reforming the Working Methods of the Security Council.



Qatar hosts workshop on Security Council Reform
On 12 & 13 May 2011, Qatar hosted a workshop on Security Council Reform in Doha. Lydia Swart of the Center was invited and she shared ten observations on this key reform process.

To move the process along, Member States, the Chair of the Intergovernmental Negotiations, and/or the President of the General Assembly will need to provide leadership by proposing a timeline/trajectory for the negotiations and by formulating a compromise solution that can garner support from all factions.



S5 presents draft resolution on Improving the Working Methods of the Security Council
By Mie Hansen, 2 May 2011
On 14 April, 2011, the Small Five Group (S5), consisting of Costa Rica, Jordan, Liechtenstein, Singapore and Switzerland, presented a draft resolution for Improving the Working Methods of the Security Council. The resolution was presented under agenda item 115 of the General Assembly (GA) that deals with follow-up to the outcome of the Millennium Summit. The S5 had presented its first draft resolution on the topic (A/60/L.49) in 2006 also as follow-up to the 2000/2005 Summits.

Update on Security Council Reform
By Mie Hansen, 5 April 2011
Since the Center’s latest update of 22 June 2010, Members States conducted text-based negotiations on 21 October 2010, 11 November 2010, 14 December 2010, and on 2 March 2011 in their efforts to reform the Security Council. Some countries apparently continue to slow down the negotiations, while others may push for a vote sooner rather than later.

Book Launch, The Group of 77: Perspectives on its Role in the UN General Assembly.
25 April 2011
Pictured from right to left: Center President William R. Pace, Minister Marcelo Suarez Salvia from Argentina (current G77 Chair), Ambassador Maged Abdelaziz of Egypt, Ambassador Herman Schaper of the Netherlands, and co-author Lydia Swart. For their remarks, click here: Minister Suarez, Ambassador Schaper, Ambassador Abdelaziz (pending) and Lydia Swart.





Text-based Negotiations in Full Swing
22 June 2010
On June 16th the negotiations on Security Council reform proceeded with the third meeting of the fifth round. The meeting aimed at getting member states to discuss specific language on the fourth “key issue”. Many countries seemed to have misunderstood the intention of the Chair, however, and restated their positions rather than making suggestions for specific changes to the document at hand.

Potentially Historic Text on Security Council Reform
By Jakob Lund, 13 May 2010
On May 10th, Zahir Tanin, the Chair of the intergovernmental negotiations on the question of equitable representation and increase in the membership of the Security Council and other matters related to the Security Council, sent out a long-awaited fax to all member states containing a “negotiation text”. The text and the annex can be accessed on the website of the PGA. The text includes the proposals sent by member states to Tanin's office since he opened the process of moving towards a text-based solution.

Open Debate on the Working Methods of the Security Council
By Jakob Silas Lund, 28 April 2010
On April 22nd, the Security Council’s Informal Working Group on Documentation and Other Procedural Issues held an open debate on the working methods of the Council. The debate raised some key questions that are relevant to the ongoing Security Council reform negotiations. Furthermore, to keep the issue of its working methods on the agenda of the Security Council is, in and of itself, an accomplishment.

A New Phase in Security Council Reform Has Started
10 February, 2010
On February 5th, the Chair of the intergovernmental negotiations on Security Council reform, Ambassador Tanin of Afghanistan, sent out a letter to all member states with an attachment of sixty pages. The document (available here and here) includes all “substantive input” submitted by Member States to the Chair thus far in the fourth round of negotiations. This marks the beginning of the fifth round, which, for the first time, will be text-based.

Moving Towards Text-Based Negotiations?
By Jakob Silas Lund, 21 January 2010
The previous month was an eventful one in terms of the Security Council reform process. On December 23rd, a group of countries sent a letter to the Chair of the intergovernmental negotiations, Ambassador Tanin of Afghanistan, urging him to present a composite paper. Following that, Tanin received a number of other letters concerning the process and on January 14th he replied with his own letter to all member states. This all culminated in the latest round of negotiations on January 19th and 20th in which the consequences of the letter exchanges were discussed.

Pros and Cons of Security Council reform
By Jakob Silas Lund, 19 January 2010
Through extensive interviews with experts as well as current and former Ambassadors and diplomats who have been close to the reform process, this article outlines and analyzes the advantages and disadvantages of the components incorporated in the proposals currently on the table.

The Long and Winding Road
by Jakob Silas Lund, 11 December, 2009
On November 16th, the chair of the intergovernmental negotiations on Security Council reform, Ambassador Zahir Tanin of Afghanistan, sent a letter to all member states inviting them to the first meeting of the fourth round of negotiations. The negotiations ended up spanning over two days rather than the planned one-day session.